They haven't been to court yet, they might be innocent.
They haven't been to court yet, they might be innocent.
the presumption of innocence is an international human right. justice-by-statistics is an extremely bad idea.
Considering that we are talking about bail (meaning 1-2 weeks in jail, not a lifetime in prison) and we have justice systems that are right 80-90% of the time, I lean towards the more pragmatic statistical approach.
The "internationally recognized human right" thing seems like a thought terminating cliche, not sure why that should be the end of the discussion.
i brought up the human rights angle because your line of thought appears to run counter to article 11 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights...but it's interesting that you can dismiss that by calling it a "cliche".