Places in America that pay people to move there
sfgate.com
sfgate.com
Marne, Iowa - Marne Elk Horne does fibre, up to 200/5 (hope you never want to upload a YouTube video!), but it'll cost you.
Curtis, Nebraska - DSL? Because of regulation: https://www.fiberconnect.org/page/nebraska-137
Harmony, Minnesota - http://www.broadbandsearch.net/service/minnesota/harmony says Centurylink has fibre, but the main game in town appears to be fixed wireless.
Baltimore, Maryland - Xfinity in some areas, but seems like it's pretty bad? 2015 - http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/technology/bs-md-ci-bro...
New Haven, Connecticut - https://broadbandnow.com/Connecticut/New-Haven says they've got fibre, but another source says it's not in many places at all. Also, how do you get 115 megabit downstream on DSL?
Alaska - Initially I laughed, but it's okay. https://broadbandnow.com/Alaska
Colorado - apparently you want to be in either Denver or Phillips: https://broadbandnow.com/Colorado
Wyoming - https://broadbandnow.com/Wyoming. Teton, maybe?
I'm not from the US, please correct me.
Longmont, where Mr Money Mustache is, has their own fiber network. 1 gig, symmetric. broadbandnow even listed longmont. https://www.longmontcolorado.gov/departments/departments-e-m...
Fort Collins just voted to add in community owned fiber.
Alot of cities voters voted to allow their communities to consider their own networks two years ago. http://blogs.denverpost.com/tech/2015/11/05/44-colorado-citi...
Everyone is just waiting for a good unlimited plan and many will just move over to hotspots / LTE routers. It has the benefit of going with you when you travel or move and the carrier like it because last mile is so expensive to upgrade.
I know a lot of people working remotely in RV's moving around the country and it's only possible because of good wireless coverage that's getting better very fast.
I think with more remote work and better wireless coverage you could see floodgate open of tech workers moving to rural areas, I know I want to.
Last year the best I could get was 15/5, and a few years ago 10/3. So it’s definitely changing for the better.
Warnings for those thinking about fixed wireless: they tend to turn off tower equipment to prevent damage during storms, your connection can be over saturated at peak times, you may have to pay overages (on non-business Plans, but significantly cheaper that overages by cellular providers), and line of sight and distance from the tower can prevent service.
Surprisingly, San Francisco has pretty shitty Internet too and it's one of the most expensive place to live in the US.
Here's what I'd imagine a remote worker's workflow:
1. Connect to your company's VPN
Then for a programmer:
a. NFS/Samba mount a drive which has your code
b. Log in to a remote VM with your development environment
c. IM client for textual communication
For a office worker:
a. Remote Desktop: Either full remote desktop or dumb terminal/thin clients
b. Google office suite/Office 365 etc.
c. Sharepoint or some such (this maybe slow IIRC)
d. A softphone for calls (this shouldn't be an issue with the bandwidths listed)
So the bottleneck can be your VPN, remote mounts or remote VMs, that's not something your internet speed can control.As long as you have at least 64Kb/s up and down available for each call (depends on codec) bandwidth is largely irrelevant... what is really important is latency and packet loss.
The article doesn't mention that the build-a-house rebate program has a "buy local" clause so you will pay more than if you buy materials at a major building center.
Jobs: Harmony is a reasonable commute to Rochester, home of the Mayo clinic, a huge employer of not just doctors and nurses but orderlies, clerks, etc, and then all the support businesses like medivans need drivers, etc.
(Source: Harmony is my wife's home town.)
The thing that is most toxic about long-term survival in small towns is the lack of many jobs. No jobs, no mortgage payment, no point.
Although if I was up for relocation right now, I'd look at Colorado (Denver/Boulder) or Baltimore...
I was recently in Oklahoma City for a JS conference (ThunderPlains), and there was no shortage of jobs. There was a shortage of devs though - the folks there felt very comfortable moving or losing jobs because there might only be a dozen jobs opening a day, but there were almost zero people applying.
For those many years, one valuable lesson I learnt is, being a sheep and following other people, in a lot of cases, aren't optimal, but ROI is not bad. Being cynical might make oneself seem smart and level headed, but you can also miss valuable opportunity. Don't assume the crowd know the best, but when there are a lot of people, that often indicates it is where the money is at.
I'm happy that OKC has jobs. That's wonderful. No sarcasm. I'm glad to hear it. But it's not rural. :) OKC is a big city compared to everywhere I used to live.
Where I am from most recently, there were 5 employers (in the tech field).
Two universities. They were doing a lot of outsourcing.
One engineering firm, which I worked for, which itself about 90% of all the local jobs.
Then 2-3 smaller firms about 1/10 the size of the firm I worked for. I hear that there's another firm in town these days.
Local pay was, after you did cost of living adjustments, about 30% under what you'd get elsewhere. New jobs that weren't in the big firm showed up about one-two a month, and a lot of that was skeevy MBA types wanting a startup.
This was a big city compared to where I grew up, which had 1-2 web site consultancies, a very-much-not-software engineering firm, and a consultancy I never really looked at.
The biggest challenge for economic development is getting the word out. It seems in my experience that people have it in their mind that cities are the only place you can find work, so they don't even bother looking for jobs elsewhere.
Correct.
There's no networking without working your arse off in those locales.
And if there are only 3-4 employers in town, you better believe that you don't want to lose your job, ever.
I can not recommend, in today's economy, a software engineer ever moving to a place without knowing there is an existing job creation engine running. It's too risky.
On the other hand, I'd move to Detroit if the employer was willing to 100% financially derisk the move (full relo, golden parachute on departure for any reason, massive funding of retirement, massive pay). :)
I don't see that being a big concern. There are several cities within easy commuting distance that are known for the tech industries. If worse comes to worse, I can still get to major tech hubs without any real hardship.
Although I also think that tech industries within small towns are vast underestimated by, again, those who don't know to look. You'd be surprised what companies are writing their own software. I continually am. I recently learned even the little mom and pop funeral home in my town has their own custom-built software (and were, when I learned about it, looking for a developer to work on it). It is not just Facebook and Google who need developers.
But the best part about small towns with more jobs than people is that employers will literally hire anyone. They aren't in a position to be choosy. You don't have to limit yourself to software engineering. You can do just about anything that is needed. If you really cannot find work as a developer, you can go do something else. No problem.
I agree that you probably shouldn't move to any random town, but with careful planning you can have the best of all worlds.
I'm not sure I agree with the risk premium either. With the numbers showing that there are more jobs than people, something that is definitely not the case in the city, you are comparatively better off as you can walk into virtually any job out there. If you are hung up on doing one specific job, that may be a different story, but I'm not sure someone at McDonalds is only willing to work at McDonalds.
Can't tell if the 'town you hail from' is the town you are currently in (then please ignore my question) or were previously (possibly raised) in.
And here is a discussion about someone considering moving to Scotland because of the fees situation:
https://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/1698260...
Of course, reasonable people can certainly disagree on whether or not this is something the government should be involved in at all.
Mind you, there's a general GP and NHS recruitment crisis already which has been compounded by Brexit uncertainty.
Personally I'm rather conflicted about which side of the debate I come down on.
The globalisation history there is that the pottery industry went away, to China. But that's an industry that the UK and the Netherlands took away from China in the first place in the 1700s.
And that's on the low side. The overtime, not the pay. I've seen job openings for ~$1600/month here and average expected overtime of 91 hours/month for one company. I've been contacted by companies offering similar.
And pay raises are pretty much based on age.
If that all sounds like an improvement over your status in America, it's easy to move over here. Pretty much all visas are approved. If that sounds bad, Japan is not a good place. For me, it was an improvement.
The difference is that rather than being explicitly "we don't want immigrants," Japanese society is a fairly closed one that relies on a niche language. No language, no acceptance.
Beyond that, for educated people to immigrate to another country, you need to have a job market that accommodates those people; Japan doesn't really have that. The wages and benefits aren't competitive and the pension system is unfriendly to immigrants. Additionally, you really need a good grasp of the language.
You can also see another recent post of mine about the difficulty of making friends in Japan, which is another thing that makes it difficult for people to come here. It doesn't help that people who come here often have a mediocre grasp of the language, which makes things more difficult and encourages them to live in a "foreign bubble," which will often lead to depression when it pops.
On the up side, the Japanese immigration process is INCREDIBLY simple, especially compared to the US one (which I've heard about second-hand from Japanese people). In order to work here, you basically need a university degree and a job that pays more than around $25k/yr -- with those, you're a shoo-in within a month or so.
Getting PR in Japan is pretty much just a matter of having lived there for 5 years and not have broken any laws.
Compare that to when my wife immigrated to Canada. Despite her speaking English, coming from an economically developed country, having a University degree and years of professional work experience we still needed to wait for over a year and it cost $2000 for everything involved.
If you want to work and live in Japan, legally speaking, it's incredibly easy. The difficulty of integrating into society is the tough part. Even with a fluent grasp of the language, you'll always be an outsider.
To say "Japan doesn't really want immigrants" is kind of accurate though. Japan relies on its closer culture to keep immigration low even though it may be more subconsciously and not a formal government policy.
Yeah, this is the part I always think of when I hear people here grousing about standing in line to submit visa paperwork or whatever. It's annoying to waste a day at immigration, but I know people in America where one partner is an American citizen and the other is an immigrant, but they've been watched and scrutinized and interviewed for years and years before the immigrant partner could get a green card. It's pretty ridiculous.
Edit: If you mean culturally, I really can't imagine any problems as long as you're friendly, respectful, and speak the language. I've lived in some fairly remote places and never had an issue; a lot of people in my experience are pretty hands-off -- even if they don't like you, they don't bother you unless you bother them.
For IT administering old, rare, industrial, and strange technology.
For mechanical skillS heavy equipment repair, tool and die cast, quarry and lumber work, or similar.