What they forget is that their journey has only been possible by a combination of intuition, skills, dedication and raw intelligence that together form a genius other people just don't have. But they do have a point in the fact that people probably underestimate the amount of work and struggle necessary to reach their results. Imposter syndrome is when you think you put too time and work to realize how logic a series of deductions is, while most of those are actually clever and their accumulations put you light-years ahead of those wouldn't didn't make them, for whom it's just magic.
Isn't that the point of "impostor syndrome"? No matter where you stand, your measurement of your ability is subjective to whatever standards you personally hold, which may be different from an objective assessment? And maybe there is no true objectivity? Maybe it's all... relative?