I had a question - From my personal experience the difference between a normal feedback (someone asking you directly) vs an employee survey are framing and scope.
For example, questions asking feedback on "leadership". Most people, specially freshman, care about feedback on the guys they are reporting to - it can be a lead, manager, director etc.
But the surveys tend to gauge all levels - project leads, managers and then company executives. So they put in questions like -
do you feel you get timely feedback? do you feel people are held accountable? do you feel you understand company vision?
etc.
Everyone attributes these to different people in management but then the HR tells them otherwise. This causes a lot of people to be disillusioned by the surveys from the time they start the careers.
How do you tackle this issue in your product?