In fact, we are seeing:
1. HRC spent more
2. HRC had total support from media (every major newspaper)
3. HRC even had social media employees manipulating their algos and data to her advantage
And now, after HRC lost, we are still using the same mechanism, and lenses, to form conclusions about why she lost.
That’s the definition of insanity.
As for 1), she clearly spent too much on old-media. You don't win the presidential election by setting fire to 4 billion USD, even if you technically "spend" the most.
That’s the definition of insanity.
Would you be able to explain why a foreign government felt the need to expend enormous resources on trolling operations in support of Trump when Hillary was going to lose anyway?
This is definitely true.
If those autocompletes weren't biased then I must be blind.