Freedom of speech does not extend to private entities such as twitter.
[0]https://ballotpedia.org/Citizens_United_v._Federal_Election_...
If that's what it means, then yes, I agree that private entities don't have to host it.
I was responding specifically to this claim:
>And if the President of the United States were to tweet something illegal?
Shifting the goal posts mid conversation is incredibly dishonest. You can see my other replies on the larger thread for the reason why Twitter should not censor him, even though they legally could.