The body of the article completely contradicts the title, making the points that Netflix has both moved on with other headline shows to attract/keep customers as well as them being praised for their quick action. So... Netflix doesn't have a mess on their hands?

Unrelated, the rest of the article is typical of newspapers rehashing the same facts for people who haven't caught a previous article. That style really dates newspaper articles for me, as it's a holdover to various print editions I imagine. You can link to a previous article instead of rewriting all the same information that's already been written before, but there's one article prepared for internet and print consumption.