Hacker News Reader

Comment by nnfy | Hacker News Reader

I'm not sure I follow; the authors claim that paying job applicants for applying attracts better talent? And they further claim that Ethiopians cannot afford the cost of generating an application?

Somehow I doubt that these results would translate to white collar jobs in the first world.

View on HN

I can absolutely imagine this being an effective strategy for companies hiring for high-talent jobs.

I have 15 years experience, and there's competition just to interview with a company. In my last job hunt I talked seriously to maybe 10 or 11 places. I did 7 onsites, two work-weeks of interviewing. But picking the ones I wanted to do on-sites with was close to random. All I usually had to go on was a 15-minute call with a recruiter.

I'm quite happy with where I've landed, but in the end I just didn't have time to talk to every company that sounded interesting. Who's hiring is a smorgasbord and lord help you if you do well on Triplebyte's second round and have 30 companies willing to do an on-site. I had to pass on interviewing with several companies that are quite interesting just because I couldn't be interviewing forever.

At some point, you just have to pick a few to dive deeper with, and it's obvious that it's random. If one had been willing to pay me to go through their process, that would have affected my odds of doing an on-site with them quite a bit. And isn't getting people in the door part of the process for recruitment?

The general concept is "friction" and it surely exists in developed countries and professionalized labor markets too, although the specific problem that they point at in the abstract is "credit" (being able to bear the time costs of applying to new jobs) which is probably a less significant factor in some other labor markets. But applying for jobs can be extremely time-consuming everywhere.

I'd be willing to try this for white collar jobs in the first world.

As a developer, your time is valuable. We'll compensate you for helping discover if we'd be a mutual fit.

1. I'd offer NYC-based K8s-savvy developers a $100 Amazon gift card for a CV and passing a phone screen, no obligation to interview on site.

2. I'd offer NYC-based K8s-savvy developers a $500 Amazon gift card for getting to an offer after an on-site interview day (more like half day), no obligation to accept offer.

Types of folks I'm looking for is listed in my profile.

In theory it sounds like a good idea, but I just wonder, what stops people from gaming such a system if it becomes commonplace?

$500 for a couple hours of trouble, assuming I'm local, isn't a bad deal.

that's the point.

the company lose more for time with the unfilled opening.... and you might like the offer.

They'd have to be qualified enough to get an actual offer. He didn't say anyone interviewing would get the $500. Not sure what sort of gaming could be done with that criteria. And with that carrot for qualified people, he's likely to get more applicants than otherwise, which is the point.

Well, not every developer is making a ton of cash, and a fair few qualified ones may be quite happy to do an interview every day or so for a bit of extra cash.

Heck, if enough companies offered $500 for a successful interview, some people would probably end up making more from going to interviews than they would accepting the offer.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com