I doubt it. There is a prohibition on promoting violence, but it seems pretty clear that it has an implicit exception for violence that is legal. Otherwise you'd see them throwing people off for various tweets about boxing, football, jousting, and other sports that involve people committing violent acts on other people.
The death penalty is legal in the US. Tweeting that you think someone who is accused of committing crimes for which that is a possible penalty should receive that penalty is almost certainly going to fall under that implicit exception.
You're incorrect here, for Twitter it's 100% about business, money and relevancy.
This is such a garbage standard. It simply amounts to any speech whoever is running the support team that day doesn't like.
Nope. It was intentional. Employee's last day.
Probably, but none of them were Trump's loved ones, so your appeal to emotion is irrelevant in his case.
As President, Trump is supposed to respect the rule of law and the rights of American citizens (all of them, even the mass-murdering terrorists) not call for their summary execution in all caps like a rageposting lunatic.
While not a "citizen" essentially, excluding voting rights.
No, I wouldn't. That seems like an easy way out for them. Why should I have to live a life of pain and suffering from my loss and they don't?