This isn't much of a surprise after looking at some of your prior comments regarding Bitcoin. A few gems:
> Yeah, imagine using Netscape in 2017 and not Chrome - that's pretty much how I look at Bitcoin.
> Thanks, but no thanks! I'd keep as far away from this stinking pile as possible!
> Mere mortals do not have Bitcoin and are not interested in it - at all.
> everything you can say about Bitcoin, you can say about land as well - it's scarce, but unlike Bitcoin, it has a real utility.
> the conspiracy theory that CIA/NSA created Bitcoin to catch crooks now makes more sense than ever.
> I don't believe in Bitcoin, which is majorly driven by low-class Chinese speculators and exchanges!
patio11 is that you in there?
Bitcoin's use-case is not microtransactions or payments among friends. It is providing secure and trustworthy payments when no trusted third party exists, independent of governments, companies, etc.
2. Owning bitcoin incurs only the environmental toll for the initial transfer into your wallet. If the $0.50 of electricity used to validate your initial transfer bothers you, buy some carbon emissions to offset that. But you probably waste much more electricity leaving Halo on pause for 10 minutes while you grab a snack.
3. If you think Chinese enterprises are immoral (which I would love to hear your reasoning on if true), then don't buy bitcoin from a Chinese enterprise. They don't have a monopoly on the currency.
Also, what do you mean by "low-class investment"? Do you mean high risk? The definition of investment is: "a thing that is worth buying because it may be profitable or useful in the future."
Given the track record of Bitcoin, I would say that so far it has proven to be a very good investment for any who have bought it so far. It's hard to argue with history.
Or maybe you are claiming to have knowledge about why the years-long trend of bitcoin growth will cease soon? Has something fundamentally changed about it recently?