> the smokers at this company are actually healthier and more productive
More productive perhaps, but healthier? I don't think so.
EDIT: Typo.
More productive perhaps, but healthier? I don't think so.
EDIT: Typo.
The question here is not whether smoking is good for you, which it obviously isn't. It's whether, in this case, the benefit of being forced by addiction to get up and engage in light physical activity once per hour outweighs the carcinogenic effects of the tobacco consumed during smoke breaks.