I 'll be that guy. What's so bad about consumers having more choice? E.g i dont use facebook or netflix, would enjoy the (cheaper rates|larger speeds).
What larger speeds? Yours, and overall bandwidth remains the same regardless of what you access.
cheaper rates, so i could afford larger speeds. come on, you 're better than that. (i' m seriously looking for counterarguments i haven't heard)
How would subsidising services that you don't use possibly reduce prices for the stuff that you do use?!
who is subsidising what?
Nothing is bad about consumers having more choice, what made you think that? And what does that have to do with net neutrality?
how is it not related? It's literally in the title of an article talking about a company offering more options to its users.
What makes the choice to pay extra for Facebook superior to having it included?
makes it cheaper for everyone else
How?
Because it is not included. You would purchase a base package for say $20 a month, then start adding the apps you want for another $5 a month each. $$profit$$