No, it's not. The position paper (from an organization whose whole mission is to push solar and get rid of nuclear) simply makes up a bunch of number. http://v.cx/2010/07/lying-about-solar
Pro-nuclear advocate
as the first post is pro-solar, this one is just the opposite. both posts are nonobjective, there's still quite a lot of religion involved in the discussion.Suppose I were to claim that Sasvari owes me one trillion dollars, based on no reliable evidence whatsoever, and Sasvari were to deny it, pointing out the lack of evidence. Are both sides in this scenario equally "religious" in their stances?