All that being said, the modulo world that the article mentions does't make sense to me. If 6 doesn't exist, how could you have modulo 6?
All that being said, the modulo world that the article mentions does't make sense to me. If 6 doesn't exist, how could you have modulo 6?
I honestly think that this answer values the children's point of view more than the article's urge to not ignore them by launching into theses on the deep impossibility of what a missing integer might mean to the universe.
All the adults in the article interpreted the question to mean 'what if six things couldn't exist?' and proceeded to formulate complex mathematical implications.
None of the adults in the story asked, "what do you mean"? And none of the adults said "maybe 3 plus 3 would be 7", or maybe "7 could be pronounced 'six'", or what if the kid was asking about one-handed people after hearing about ancient kings who cut hands off of rule breakers, and was really just wondering in kid style whether it'd be better if we have a base 5 number system instead of base 10.
That wouldn't be very nice towards them, though. Many times children ask questions not because they're interested in their particular questions - quite often they don't really have a clue of what they're asking, as you mentioned - but they ask for the sake of learning something.
At least, that's the usual answer to "why children ask so many questions": because they like to learn, more than because they have a specific question.
It's finite so just write out the addition and multiplication tables: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Z%2F6Z
In our world that doesn't have sqorkle, what is 3 modulo sqorkle? Since is less than the modulus, it should just be 3, right? 4 modulo sqorkle: 1, I guess, being 1 above sqorkle? OK, so what about 4 mod 3? It's defined as 1 in our world, but in a world where 3+2=4, that can't still be true, right?
Mathematical constructs are based on patterns that we see in the world. Change the nature of the patterns, and you invalidate the mathematical constructs that we've built up. I'd think that since our constructs would be invalid in sqorkle-land, trying to apply them there will just end up with contradiction. Ditto, trying to apply our math to 6-less-land.