Unless you can prove what I wrote didn’t happen to me, i can as well insult you of pushing misinformation about what happened to me and what not.
I talk about personal experience and clearly mark it as such.
And then, i didnt know this is a forum of „low-information patients“ - but i start to believe it...
Furthermore it has been said in the article that there is no verified cure for colds. Insofar even if someone would refuse to take other non-verified, more expensive medications because of my report, it wouldn’t do harm. It’s just changing one unverified cure against another.
do i talk about cancer? No. It’s about colds.
Believing only in studies will not help you at all - many studies have been proven to be false for many different reasons and later detected errors. Just happened for cancer studies of multiple decades!
So with your randomly selected criteria there‘s still many things that can be wrong, and the same goes for all studies that prove Vitamin C helps and those that prove it doesn’t. You forgot age, for example... 30 colds is at least 3, at my current rate rather 10-15 years... a lot changes in a body. I can be weaker due age, or fitter due more sports etc...
So i believe only in what works for me, and i report about it personally with clear marking that it’s just that, personal experience.
And i didn‘t recommend anything to anyone else.
Also, i said that success rate is just 2/3. THAT would have been a good point to attack my idea that Vitamin C helps - because it is actually a low rate.
While we discuss this, a lot of money is spend for other cures of cold that equally has no proof of working. But this is accepted... you might be better off trying to stop big pharma for advertising anything as a cure for cold instead of insulting me for telling personal experiences.