http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/eye-patch-therapy-a-boo...
The difference is now we have a strong hint as to why they work.
I would expect that the social stigma would severely limit uptake in school though, which is why this isn't standard today -- kids can be rather vicious when they pick up on any hint of difference or weakness.
Random idea--what about a completely opaque contact lens, with an image of an iris/pupil on the outside, customized for the person's eye color? It would likely be noticeable up close, but could take away a lot of this social stigma.
Note that eye patches are already being commonly used in that age group for treating amblyopia
> About 700 million people worldwide are known to have from dyslexia – about one in 10 of the global population.
Although I suspect blind-in-one-eye will be primarily due to accidents, so that hopefully isn't correlated with dyslexia.
Isn't this a biological analogy?
Except that "neural nets" are only "neural" by a (biological) analogy to neurons.
So he is describing a biological phenomemon by comparison to a a type of machine learning which is itself described by the very same biological phenomenon he's trying to describe.
This is why I hate them.
They only hold up at the level of analogy.
At times I have tried using a single contact lense for my lazy eye, but it causes headaches so I gave up on that.
Probably no. It's normal for a certain period of child development.