College:
30 weeks
40 hours per week
4 years
= 4800 hours
Work: 49 weeks
50 hours per week
2 years
= 4900 hours
And that's being generous at only a 50 hour work week, as well as being generous in giving a full 40 hours worth of college work. I think your comment perfectly demonstrates my point.This seems like a left turn from my comment. Nowhere did I say bootcamps are a replacement for formal education. I was comparing the value of time in the workforce vs. time spent in school. I was discussing finance majors who, shockingly, also do internships. I don't know anyone that took a bootcamp as a replacement to a college education, so I'm not sure where you pulled any of this from.
> I don't know where you work that a developer working "only" 50h weeks is "generous" but I hope I never find myself applying there.
Maybe my part of the world is unique, but I've never worked less than 50 hours per week in my 10 years and I honestly can't say I know anyone that does excluding people with "non-professional" jobs.
Some of the stats in the thread seem to indicate that a not insignificant minority do self employ or consult.
I say this as someone who just went to college because that's what you do and only got into software because my degree led to a $10/hr job which could not pay rent and student loans. If I had gotten 25 or 30 an hour there's a good chance I never would have had the impetus to teach myself anything
I wasn't, I explicitly said I can't speak for finance majors. My point I would not consider 2 years of work and a 4 year CS degree from a well-regarded school to be equivalent for technical hires.
(This is at a state school in the US.)
Seriously, that's insane. I've never heard of anything even resembling that.