> fiat currencies issued by strong stable states capable of taxing their citizens, with banking systems effective at encouraging widespread borrowing, with large, diversified domestic economies (and so the capacity to do with fewer imports if necessary) that borrow in their own currency, and do not have sizable debts in foreign currency aren't weak.
This speaks to me as if the author has a modicum of trust in the current banking industry, saying: "I trust that we can still solve the problems we've created." Call me a skeptic, but I don't. That is the fundamental problem that cryptocurrencies were created to solve; trustless money.
I agree with the author on the part of currency needing to be stable, and cryptocurrencies in their current state are not stable. However, as more and more value is attributed to cryptocurrencies, and more and more people adopt it, those fluctuations will even out. I feel comparing crypto's stability with most fiat money is like comparing the gait of a toddler with that of a grown man. It takes time, effort, and entropy to gain the momentum needed to be stable, crypto is still in its early-adoption-phase.
> Fiat currencies are no more “created from thin air” than...
Fractional Reserve Banking would like a word.