> What I'm most surprised by in this thread is the toxicness. As of right now there are only two threads that I can see, one that is slamming Gitlab's salaries and one that is slamming their reliability.
After many year on the internet, it's not that surprising. It's best summed up as, "Haters gonna hate.".
The jabs at the cloud offerring's reliability are valid. That includes both uptime and the horrendous data loss event they had earlier this year. I don't recall anything major after though not knowing about internals, can't tell if they learned from it or have just gotten lucky.
As a CE user I love GitLab. It does what it says on the tin and for the most part I don't have to think about it. The UI changes every other release are bit haphazard but not enough for me to truly care.
I've always thought that slamming their open comp policy is hilarious. They're one of the most open companies about how they handle comp and the result is they get insulted for it. I'm not saying I agree with the formulas (in particular the non-NYC COLA adjustments are out of whack) or the general approach, but to say they're worse than the voodoo guesswork that goes into figuring out how much a company is going to pay you is disingenuous. Especially if it's after a number of interviews only to find out they're going to low ball you.
At least in GitLab's case I know, at the current comp levels, I'd never work there or even interview there. And that's beyond fair for the worker. Plus it seems to be working fine because they've got a bunch of people that are happy to work there.