Hacker News Reader

> So you have two camps. People who believe correctness is important, and people who think continuous deployment is an answer to bugs.

I am curious as to how the people of the second group (if they do, in fact, exist) think that the continuous deployment of serially faulty code is a solution to anything.

View on HN

I don't think there is such a group (or at least it is very small). What continuous deployment does do is help you find bugs faster as they get shipped sooner. It also promotes more automated testing which can help as well since manual testing is less likely to fully regress everything.

> What continuous deployment does do is help you find bugs faster as they get shipped sooner.

Yep, that's the thinking that stresses me in the second group.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com