Hacker News Reader

Comment by colejohnson66 | Hacker News Reader

According to OpenSecrets[0] (MPAA PAC), it’s $100k - $200k, or about $1k - $5k per politician. That’s actually a lot less than I expected

[0]: https://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/lookup2.php?strID=C00139519

View on HN

This latest article about Detroit developers seems to support that [0]. A meager $300K dished out to politicians opened up the possibility of $700M-$1B plus the developers of these buildings can collect income tax from businesses and folks who occupy them for the next 20 years.

What's the now?!

[0] https://www.metrotimes.com/detroit/how-dan-gilbert-just-scor...

It's a bit more subtle than that, in the same way that the cost of an ad is larger than the cost to place that ad somewhere. But on steroids.

If you just show up and dump $300k on some politicians laps, the effect isn't likely to be particularly overwhelming. You need to cultivate relationships, wait for a good moment (when the money is disproportionately valuable to said politician), at least sell the perception that you're able and willing to dish up more in the future, etc.

So the actual cost is a lot higher than the amount the politician actually receives.

I feel we need to stop complaining and begin playing this game as the others do. A community such as HN alone could raise this much in a matter of minutes.

My take on it that I've expressed for years: "I'm not surprised that politicians are whores. I'm horrified that they're CHEAP whores."

Reply on news.ycombinator.com