Is America Facing Another Sputnik Moment?
newyorker.com
newyorker.com
But all the article does is rehash history. A more accurate title would be, "It's the Sputnik anniversary, here are some thoughts".
You hear things like this alot,
- The US knew about Pearl Harbor attacks and let them happen
- The US knew about 9/11 and let it happen.
- The US knew about soviet misses moving to Cuba and let them get there intentionally.
Most people dismiss this as tinfoil hat territory. I wonder how many of these "conspiracies" have any truth to them?
As to the US facing a "Sputnik Moment" now, I don't think the article lays out any valid reasons why now is their Sputnik moment. You could have written this article any year from 1969 to now and it would be equally true.
On the one hand, we are encouraged to make decisions based on facts/data/evidence. Speculation is speculation. Anything goes.
On the other hand, if we only do this we are bound by the “reality” that has been provided to us. No evolution/revolution can occur.
History is filled with documented cases of these “conspiracies”.
I’d be really interested in hearing other peoples’ views on this.
A lot of conspiracies probably exist. Mostly they fight with each other (knowingly or otherwise), work at cross purposes, and don't have exactly the predicted effects any more than any of the rest of us can predict the future precisely either. And people underestimate what people can do. At the risk of being excessively topical, as an example, at the moment I see nothing in particular about the Las Vegas shooting incident that requires a conspiracy to have occurred. That doesn't prove there wasn't one, and I reserve the right to change my mind as evidence comes in, but at the moment, I don't see anything that requires that as an explanation. In a world of 7 billion people, a non-trivial number of which are crazy, a non-trivial number of those of which recently went crazy due to environmental factors such as drugs (prescription and otherwise) or brain tumors, I don't think the baseline of such incidents will ever be zero.
(And I'm not necessarily all that hard pressed to more-or-less believe the official account of 9-11 either, honestly.)
In summation, I think that certainly some conspiracies exist, but they are less powerful and omniscient that people ascribe to them, that there are things that "just happen" without a conspiracy, and that sometimes they do succeed and remain secret.
I'd also observe that just like there's a rush every time a new product comes out to be the first to denounce it and declare it's utter failure, there's a rush to be the first person to declare that you can see the workings of a conspiracy or how something is a false flag operation. In our social media age, this is what I would call "the expected result", not some sort of surprise or meaningful signal.
The other three things you mention don't reach that kind of standard at all.
Pretty likely IMO. A while back I summed up some of the evidence that I've come across in this comment:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14136336
If any of my summary is off base I would like to know -- but at this point I am pretty resolute in the belief that at the very least high-level Bush administration officials should be formally investigated regarding foreknowledge of 9/11.
How are crewed missions not in line with the Apollo missions praised earlier in the article? I am a huge supporter of basic research but NASA had plenty of success with research which was performed to support/enable a more applied purpose.
Is it as relevant today as it was back then? The rest of the BRIC nations hadn't yet reached their ascendancy, and outsourcing was in its infancy. AI automation was a fantasy.
Personally I find that with all the recent Space X announcements, space exploration really feels like the future is arriving. It turns out we don't need flying cars, but having space rockets that land themselves, having moon bases and people on Mars genuinely is the future.
This kind of stuff excites me and makes me long for the future. Automation doesn't.
Obligatory XKCD: https://www.xkcd.com/1232/