Sitting down too much is doing more harm to your body than you can imagine
elth.co
elth.co
'Did you get that email I sent you?'
Ahhhhhh~ No. Please don't.
There's plenty of good advice on this article, but be careful that the things that you do for yourself don't negatively impact other people; that's not be healthy, its being thoughtless and selfish.
I've worked with people that are a clamshell. It's not a very nice environment. Nobody in a company works "on an island".
For what it's worth I'm good at my job and my employer doesn't set unrealistic expectations, work time is work time, home time is home time. I don't blur the boundaries, if you want a social chat that's what lunch times are for.
I've worked with Germans in the past, they are much more like me (I'm English) in that regard.
Or they are a developer. Being interrupted while programming is really rough. It's like being an insomniac and having trouble falling asleep, when someone walks up and starts talking to you riiiight as you're drifting off. Now you're up for another two hours.
Another analogy is you're building a house of cards using your mental concentration - someone distracting you causes you to knock the whole thing down. Oh, and the house of cards is due Friday.
Being interrupted is a universal human problem, there is no need for an analogy for something that anyone who works in a professional (or hell even non professional) job experiences.
Even with programming it does matter what tasks you are working on. Many tasks don't need that much time to get into and out of it, only some do.
Oh, I see. Yes, I would wholeheartedly agree with that. To his point, I would say many people on here don't necessarily think developers are special in that regard, but most people are developers and they are speaking on that which they know.
I'm a developer (obviously) and I couldn't intelligently speak on how interruptions would disrupt a soft skill profession such as marketing, sales or HR.
And with all this complaining about interruptions and lost productivity, its really only the "sexy tech startups" that seem to have ping pong and foosball tables to waste time playing.
If you're doing something simple, then it's just a matter of regaining focus. Sometimes devs are doing simple things and interruptions aren't such a big deal, but when we're deep into a debugging session or something it's more of a problem.
This is not to say devs are the only people who work on complicated problems like this, but plenty of non-technical people in software shops don't, and tend to not understand that interruptions are a real problem sometimes.
I haven't met a single engineer who doesn't recognize that a complex software system is infinitely more complex than any engineering project. Software complexity with its myriad of states is not a joke. Your engineering project, no matter the project, has orders of magnitude fewer variables and possible states. Look into the cognitive load-demands of juggling these multiple layers of complexity and abstractions in your head, and you'll start to understand.
There's a cognitive loading stage necessary before you can do any work. An interruption wreaks havoc on this, and you have to start over; go through the cognitive load phase again. Depending on the code base that can be a substantial process.
I agree with that. But I also think that being in an office full of developers that can't use their "inside voice" is a horrible environment to spend 1/3 of your life in.
My experience has been that, unless delivered in an exceptionally conciliatory manner (exaggeratedly, actually), this kind of request gets interpreted as rude by a lot of people. For me, at least, I think it comes from many people assuming they have a "quick question" or that their "small" request isn't difficult to fulfill.
I started responding to "quick question" with "long answer". That and I also hung a sign on my chair with my official office hours. Neither actually worked, and people thought I was rude, but it did make me feel better to try to push back. ;)
Long term my takeaway is that while too many meetings drain the life out of people, there's also a layer of communication that needs to happen, and when too much interrupting is going on, it's a sign that the right kind of meetings aren't taking place. Now instead of getting annoyed, I start to track the "quick question" categories, and create new channels for the commonalities, ideally Slack or email rather than a meeting, but in person when it gets big enough.
In my experience it's difficult to set the bubble boundaries. Some days I'm working on small tasks and wouldn't mind being interrupted, other days I need uninterrupted concentration. It's hard to communicate that with colleagues. Maybe there should be a general rule — mornings in the zone, then after lunch handle all tasks that require sync-up + training + selling.
I have a phone on my desk that is set to flash, not ring and only then if it's the boss, everyone else just silently rings (and then I get an email a few minutes later "tried ringing, anyway about <unimportant thing>".
and they don't have a clue how destructive they are.
it's such a great example of clashing perspectives. they think they're being friendly and reasonable. the hapless and frustrated programmer thinks they're ignorant, lazy, and annoying.
Best programming job I've ever had and for someone who was damn close to burnout it feels like a holiday!
Our society is at a point where there are large numbers of people who think their feelings trump larger concerns, like those of the workplace, their job, driver/pedestrian safety, and the rule of law. There is a set of ideas that involves executive function, the delay of gratification, the adherence to ideals, and subsuming the petty ego. It's called being an adult.
If you think your feelings trump such concerns, take a good, hard look at yourself. Are you a narcissist? Do you really subscribe to an objective reality in your actions?
If you are hiring people, look for people who are the opposite to the above.
Do you have a manager you can sit down with for ten minutes and explain this dynamic to? It's possible your colleagues don't fully understand the implications of their actions and would happily oblige you if they only knew.
Of course I don't know your situation, and given how dysfunctional some office environments are if may be possible that your options are truly limited. In my experience though there usually are options before brinkmanship.
> Do you have a manager you can sit down with for ten minutes and explain this dynamic to?
Yes, he disagrees with my position.
> It's possible your colleagues don't fully understand the implications of their actions
My colleagues do fully understand.
>...how dysfunctional some office environments are
We just moved into an newly built open office plan RIGHT next to finance (finance has our "loud laugher", you know who I'm talking about). Someone thought this was a good idea....
Not only did that piss me off because I would be in the zone (I usually leave my phone at my desk and close all emal/slack tabs to not be disturbed) when he would totally interrupt for a silly question (a la the "did you get my mail?" question).
Please please don't do this. Nothing comes across more selfish and signals that you feel that your time is more important than mine to me than this.
Just for fun, somebody should write a "track-and-trace" type of website for email. Then whenever somebody asks that question, give them a track and trace code.
Dev1: "Hey, your last commit's message was only 'fixed bugs'. Which bugs did you fix"?
Dev2: "Sure. But I'm working on something right now. Shoot me an email about this and I'll send you the bug list by the end of the day."
There is a reason why we have email/messaging. Many times, it just works better. There are things that are better asked in person, there are things that are better asked in an email.
Much as people like to check their Inbox first thing to get it out of the way before starting productive work, I find that getting my walk in the morning before I have breakfast and sit down to start work ensures that it happens. If I tried to fit it in late in the day, I know that a long debug session or support email thread with a customer will easily derail it.
Organised activity is also good for making me stick to schedules. I took up Kendo about 18 months ago, and the regularly scheduled classes and training sessions are good for forcing me off the computer and go work up a sweat. I especially love the little 30 second meditation we do at the start and end of each class. The purpose of the starting meditation is to put aside all our normal work/life/personal worries and stresses, and focus on the sport, then the end meditation is to bring them all back again.
Mokuso was integral to teaching me to relax and focus; I try to continue meditating even though I haven't done kendo for years, but some days I just want to be sitting in my keikogi in a chilly dojo listening to someone shout "MOKUSOOO~" -- something about that environment was conducive to relaxing.
I particularly enjoy the ceremony surrounding Kendo. That, coupled with the discipline really helps me to focus and push myself both physically and mentally. It makes a great counterpoint to the purely intellectual activity of programming, which I find helps balance me.
Instead of assessing the problem as "sitting," maybe we should look at what scientific data says. I know food manufacturers put a hell of a lot of sugar in foods, even foods you wouldn't expect, like spaghetti sauce. They use it as a preservative, so it's in damn near everything.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/guides/z8849j6
I know watching food commercials subconsciously compels people to eat, even after the restaurants are closed. Children consume 45% more food when exposed to food commercials.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2743554/
I know certain foods, sugar in particular, have addictive properties similar to cocaine.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23719144
Sitting may very well be a factor, but this article shows no links to any studies. Until I see some data, I'll consider it BS and so should you.
Isn't this one of those standard logic fallacies? I mean, A is true, B is true, but that does not mean B is true because A is true? There might be plenty of other factors affecting B. The advance in medical science for one. At least I always thought that alone was the most influencial factor on better life expectancy. Probably more than enough to even undo the effect of certain lifestyle habits making things worse.
But yes, the article pretty much fails to provide exact numbers or even estimates on how bad a sedentary lifestyle really is.
Kudos to the creator (OP). Looks to be a very well-done (if click-baity, but hey, that’s how you....well....kind of...get clicks these days) project, and it comes across very much like many of the larger content creators.
Care to share some background on the project? Looks like you launched pretty recently. Goals? Am I correct in my assumptions here?
I'll keep polishing it.
A quick look at the source suggests that this might be the WordPress theme that the site is based on: https://themeforest.net/item/times-extraordinary-newspaper-m...
First of all, thanks for going through the mission statement and appreciating what I'm doing with this project.
Having worked in a startup for over 2 years now, there's one thing that I have noticed.
Most people like their butts glued to their chair and keeping activity to a minimum.
I mean like for traveling even 1KM they tend to get a cab.
I tried getting some guys to the gym with me or to eat healthy.
Some tried. Some didn't. Most of them didn't stick to their healthy habits for long.
What I was doing was cheerleading them to health. That's not the push they required.
They needed to know what's wrong with their current habits. Why they should be improving their habits. How to do it.
That is when this project was born.
I wanted to hand out claims that are backed by science in a lucid manner. Also, what I think most blogs do is just say stuff and end the article.
I want my readers to take away actionable tips after completing the article. They should be knowing what to do right after reading each article.
That's my main aim with this project. Educate, inspire, and influence people towards a better life. To help them decide what's good for them.
I launched the site yesterday. Planning to do 1-2 solid articles each week.
Thanks again for your kind words. I'm more thrilled to work on this project after reading this comment.
Made my day.
Watch out for more articles on the blog.
Cheers!
Rahul
I wish our brains could keep this bad, guilty-like feeling that makes us take action around for longer.
In my experience, if you can just get over that hump to a point where you start to look good, or get strong, or feel good, it becomes an activity, not a chore. Your body is incredible and it's a shame to not see a glimpse of its potential.
This simple concept was very helpful to me, and I hope to others as well.
It's an awesome idea, life changing even. 5 seconds later your rational self catches up with the idea and starts to counter with 'but I don't have enough time', 'it's too hard', 'maybe tomorrow', etc.
The next time you get the idea to exercise more you need to stop what you are doing right then and there and do something about it. Maybe it's not the best time to start exercising at 3am when you have the idea, but at least put it down in your calendar with an alarm/reminder/something. The point being you need to take action on those ideas as soon as you have them, or they are gone.
If you're at home, there's no reason not to just do 10 pressups right there and then (and as you get better, 20, 30 and so on). Or dips with your chair if you can't do pressups yet.
you need it to be a kind of mediating objective to not lose that pledge. otherwise, the inevitable abandonment comes after exercising a handful of times, if that :P
my intuition tells me you'd need a goal that has pushups (or exercise at all) only as a subcomponent along the path towards the attainment of that goal. hopefully it would persist longer than if solely working out were the goal. so that it doesn't feel "empty" or easily abandon-able after doing it a few times.
And in my opinion are entirely missing the point because they take more pre-planning and effort. Even if only a little.
The problem people are trying to solve is "how do I go from nothing to exercising even a little?" The problem you are helping them solve is "how do I get more/ the most out of my workout?"
It's a serious pet-peeve of mine. I know you mention it with good intentions, but people often try to help others by telling them their personal favourite item, vs helping them solve their problem.
People do similar with programming languages. For a one off project or getting started sometimes a shitty language is the best way to help someone for their specific problem.
1. http://exrx.net/Kinesiology/Posture.html
2. https://www.theptdc.com/2014/07/upper-crossed-syndrome/
As for programming languages, I've sent "pull requests" for AutoHotKey programs via Reddit PM before. If it's the right tool (or a decent one) for the job...
At this time, when my mind is clearest (there are several other metaphors I could use here, but let’s go with that), I feel like I could totally exercise as hard as I should for as long as I should without getting caught by that nasty energy-saving mechanism we call laziness.
As a comparison, many people are willing to grind for hours on an MMO character, but aren’t willing to go to the gym for half an hour a day. Without the normal din of brain activity, it’s easy to apply the video game mentality to your meatspace person.
The thing that did finally get me habitually exercising (while sober, of course) was an in-work gym, since sometimes repeatedly lifting heavy things is preferable to another minute dealing with most software products.
1 - Cut sugar from your diet 2 - Reduce junk food from your diet (start having homemade food) 3 - Start doing bodyweight exercises
and so on.
It will be much easier to stick to the plan if you break your goal into smaller actionable steps.
Pain teaches me away from sitting too long, but the catch is of course to have some alternatives, like taking a break or standing, or doing yoga, if I didn't have those experiences and routines I wouldn't really probably know or recognize the pain, as the pain would be every day with me.
Standing desk is a great invention, but I've noticed I cannot stand all day long, as I cannot sit all day long, best solution for _me_ is to alternate between standing and sitting, that seems to do the trick.
That horse has bolted, unfortunately. Clickbait works and everyone is at it. My pet peeve is "considered harmful. Do all the things that are "considered harmful" in headlines and you will probably come to no harm.
Most of us have standards around hygiene, dental care, personal appearance etc that are almost immutable.
If you have a standard that you want to remain fit and that becomes deep-rooted then there is nothing to think about. It will happen.
I think you can also just call this personal values.
It actually surprised me learning later in life that Tony Robbins is not the total charlatan I always assumed he was.
Discipline trumps motivation every time.
I used to do sedentary lifestyle most of my life until I found rock climbing 2 years ago
I go rock climbing to a gym 2-3 times a week now. I go there because I WANT not because I have to. This did tremendous job to my health and overall fitness. And this is sustainable in the long term because I don't have problems with motivation.
So my advice — find your sport, any physical activity you are interested in. If it becomes boring, don't hesitate to change it.
You don't need to be a sportsman and become good at something, you just need consistency to move your body , so care about your motivation. Good body will come naturally after some time.
If you do not exercise at all right now, doing very little is already a big improvement over essentially nothing. The diff between 0 and 15 min is far greater and significant than 15 and 30 min.
You can start with something simple like doing some minor exercises every 5 min after 1 hr of sitting. It is going to help you focus more as well, because your brain will be in diffused instead of focused mode whilst you're exercising.
I can highly recommend Nederland in Beweging on Dutch TV (tho I doubt you're Dutch, American TV is massive so I hope there's something akin to it). It is 15 minutes a day with a warming up and cooling down. The Dutch government (or well, "gezondsheidsraad") recommends 21 minutes a day of movement and twice a week heavy exercise. With those 15 minutes, you're well under way to reach 21 min and the exercises are different every workday, and target different muscles, so your entire body is in the end in shape. That's in contrast to say running 3 times a week. You meet the heavy exercise requirement, but you won't meet the 21 min one, and various of your muscles (e.g. hamstrings and more or less entire arms) will be weak.
Doing this may also very well increase your overall happiness (and decrease depression), increase your focus, decrease your fatigue, and decrease your procrastination.
1. I had to stop feeling like someone else was going to tell me how to do it or make me do it. Start going to the gym and do whatever exercises you like doing. Keep showing up, and change your posture. Don't think "I should exercise more." Think "I'll go on Tuesday nights when I don't have as much going on." Work from the assumption that you're already a person who exercises, and just think about the mechanics of actually making time for it. We spend way too much time thinking about how we become gym people instead of just going and exercising.
2. As some other people have pointed out, realize that you can't undo a sedentary work day by working out for an hour at the end of the day. One trick I use is to do pomodoros (25 minute chunks of work) followed by a 3-5 minute break where I get up and just walk or look out the window. If my motivation or focus is flagging, sometimes I'll use that time to read a couple of paragraphs on my Kindle app. (Churchill said "a change is as good as a rest"; sometimes taking your eye of the ball for a minute can help you refocus your mind). By moving a little many times throughout the day, I find I don't build up those slow and steady tensions that ruin your body and will to exercise.
- I work with computers so sitting or standing a large portion of time is inevitable.
- Is the real problem sitting/standing, or being unfit? If I don't get fat and if I keep fit, will I be ok? Or will sitting still harm me?
- If the claim is that sitting still harms me, how robust is the science here? Do they control for the above? If sitting, as opposed to poor fitness is the problem, does regular movement help? or are we just doomed to this if we use computers?
The solution to all the problems this create for your body is to use your muscles, and even just a little bit is enough.
- If you are usually standing: you don't have to be standing up for hours, just a few hours are enough.
- If you are usually sitting: a yoga ball is great. You don't have to move all around, keeping your balance on the ball will be good enough.
- And every hour you can take a quick break, or talk to someone so you will move out of your computer and use your muscles.
- Overweight, unfit, and sitting/standing for long periods.
- Unfit and sitting/standing for long periods but not overweight.
- Sitting/standing for long periods but not overweight or unfit.
If obesity was the only health-related issue you could just eat less. If Obesity and unfitness were the only issues you could just get some exercise outside of work hours. And if all three are an issue you'd want to keep active as much as possible during work (although not too much... because physical labour jobs hurt people's health too).
Relax! This is called a good "work-life balance." ;) Life is not some sprint. No one is going anywhere. There is no finish line unless you construct it.
I also replaced my train commute with a bicycle for some extra health points (and post-work motivation. Full trains depressed and demotivated me)
Same as you, I do IF and try to eat my last meal at ~6pm and don't think about food until next days lunch.
Other things that helps me a lot with being more motivated is trying to leave the office while it's still bright outside. I want to leave earlier because I'm happier and at the same time have more time+motivation for other things.
How do you manage your social life along with these activities? I find that it gets in the way of things I do, but on the other hand, not keeping in touch with friends (who don't do the same activities as you) just drives them away.
It will likely require a shower afterwards though which might pose a problem.
1) A 60 degree F room to stave off sweating
2) Enough exercise to be healthy but that stops just short of making you sweat
3) (2) is variable based on body weight of course
Sometimes the practical solution isn't the most efficient.
I mean if you're chatting with coworkers and relaxing during the walk then it's a different story - but if you're just in to it for health benefits - like I've seen people suggest walking home from work, etc. - just take the shorter route and do proper exercise.
Threre are a couple health benefits that walking has over HIIT. For my particular case, my doctor told me that the amount of time I sustained an elevated heart rate was more important than how hard I pushed myself (don't try to walk the same distance in a shorter time, instead walk for longer). And there are cognitive benefits unique to walking [1].
I can't speak for anyone else, but waking turned out to be my gateway drug to all kinds of other healthy lifestyle changes.
[1] https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/10/walking-f...
The article isn't about exercising once or twice a day though. It's about you sitting around too much during the day. Not regularly being even minorly active, no?
Perhaps I'm mistaken but it seems like the people talking about their once or twice a day exercise arent on the same page as the article.
I've talked with multiple physical therapists about it and they've been very clear about that distinction. Other commenters here are missing the point.
I myself don't do enough of either so I'm not helping myself enough yet.
I wish more articles and news outlets would do this. If journalist are going to critique something or show that its problematic I really appreciate it when they give me enough data to go explore and discover more on my own and when they also give me something actionable (preferably based on a body of research itself) which I can do to solve the issue / problem.
A copy editor (or even autocorrect) wouldn't have gone amiss.
The movement also helps me maintain energy levels during long periods of working, which can lull if I'm sedentary. I even find maintaining 'flow' perfectly attainable (provided that your mind stays on work between the breaks, and you don't check things like e-mails). I see the Pomodoro break more as a physical break from sitting, with the option of taking a mental break from work if I think it's necessary.
Awesome so now I have no choice but to get immediately dropped out of my zone to answer your question. Go for your walk but go back to your desk and send me your message so I can add it to my queue of other questions that I'll get to once I've debugged this block.
I get up and do stretches and exercises every time it tells me to take a break. I set it for every 11 minutes, but it seems like the breaks are further apart than that. There were noticeable improvements within a week.
- I don't have a desk or chair. I have a bar table and a stool. This makes a huge difference. I get uncomfortable sitting on the stool after about 30 minutes, so I get off. Then I'll stand at the bar table and work for an hour or two. When I get tired of that, I'll spend a minute or two doing a physical activity (see below).
- I try to work from different physical places, e.g., cafes, different places in the house when nobody is home, the steps outside, the floor, the hammock hanging by the lake. I make it a game to come up with new and novel places to work from that don't require a lot of travel time (unless I'm walking—then it's well-spent travel time), anything to change the physical position of my body while working (and hopefully something that gets uncomfortable within an hour so I'm pushed to change again).
- I have a sandbag next to the bar table that I'll pick up at random times throughout the day and do squats, deadlifts, bent-over rows, or just carry the 60lb thing up the stairs or out around the yard once. I'll also use it as a weight to hold my feet while I do sit-ups. I have a pull-up bar hanging between two trees outside.
- I don't watch TV. In fact, I try to avoid anything that involves the sitting position. If I have to sit, I prefer the floor, or if I'm watching a movie or reading a book, I prefer laying down. If it's something for a few minutes and I can stand, I'll stand.
I've been doing this for about a year now and it's the best I've ever felt while working this much. What I'd like to start mixing in are some runs or long walks, but right now it's a choice between those or getting sufficient sleep. I prioritize sleep.
Another reason I decided to try it out is that when I am comfortably seated I can spend hours on HN. Yes it is ironic that I am standing and posting on HN but truth be told in 10 or so minutes I will be tired and forced to take a walk. I am hoping to curb some bad online habits by standing.
https://standsteady.com/blogs/standing-by-day/what-to-wear-s...
> Joints get the bulk of their nutrition from range of motion. The vast majority of joints in the body are synovial: two bones surrounded by a leathery capsule filled with fluid. The cartilage surfaces receive very little blood flow. In order to receive nutrition, the joint must “lubricate” itself with the fluid of the joint, absorbing nutrients from the fluid along its surface – via regular, full range of motion.
> When joints stop moving through their full range, elements of cartilage do not get this nutrition. The cartilage dries up. And it is replaced with bone. This, by definition is osteoarthritis. Preceding that, is pain. --http://www.irunfar.com/2012/10/is-your-plantar-fasciitis-pla...
At least make sure that weekends you have hobby that requires to go outside. If you find yourself walking all the weekend is going to be easier to stand at the office.
I also have tried playing VR games with "room scaling". It forces you to play standing.
The more exercise and time you spend standing, the easier it becomes. But the reverse is also true. If you feel tired all the time, it is hard to start exercising and you need to trick yourself into bootstrapping the habit.
It’s cheaper than a gym, needs little space, elevates my heart rate more than running ever did, and there are tricks to learn to keep it fresh and progressively raise the difficulty (double-unders, cross-overs etc.).
I got a kettlebell and go on YouTube everyday to find some exercise videos.
There are so many videos I can do a new one each time which prevents me from getting bored.
Typically you don't stand still at a standing desk. Your legs will naturally want to move and stretch and since you're already standing, you can do this without really being disturbed.
Also, it sounds funny but walking and even running is a nice "break" from standing. It gives you more energy. I tend to break up my day with 2-3x ~2 mile walks.
There's other big wins too like much improved posture (especially if you were like me and sat in crazy positions).
If anyone wants to try out a standing desk without investing hundreds of dollars on an adjustable one I wrote a guide on how to build a custom standing desk to fit your desk[0] (without needing a saw):
[0]: https://nickjanetakis.com/blog/build-a-home-made-standing-de...
To be clear, you do ~2 mile walks two to three times per day? So you walk 4 - 6 miles per day? It actually sounds kind of appealing to me—I like walking... but it seems like a serious amount of time, and like finding places to walk might be difficult.
I don't see it as a waste of time. Often times I'll step away from a programming problem and get the solution while walking, which in turn saves time in the long run.
I just go around my neighborhood, nothing fancy.
With all due respect, where is the source? The problem is that it is very difficult to prove this scientifically. It is plausible that people who exercise more do other things which increase their health, such as smoke less or not at all, drink less or not at all, eat more healthy, are more content in life, are more rich or more educated, etc.
https://www.runnersworld.com/sweat-science/standing-all-day-...
And so is lying down in bed :)
https://www.scienceabc.com/humans/why-is-it-a-bad-idea-to-st...
Oh, and what about running
https://www.active.com/health/articles/why-too-much-running-...
https://www.runnersworld.com/runners-knee
It seems the best is normal movement and walking, and taking breaks.
Too much of anything is bad. But perhaps generalizations like this lead to a lot of sensationalism.
Here's another one. Are you better off staying in or heading out for a while every day?
Staying in:
https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/vitamin-d-deficiency-sy...
https://www.vitamindwiki.com/Suicide+associated+with+low+vit...
Going out:
http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/causes-of-cance...
http://www.youbeauty.com/beauty/sun-and-acne/
It is like those studies in the past which said wine is good for the heart ... wait it's not good ... wait a small amount is good and too much is bad.
http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/heart-disease/...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10153165 http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-04469-001
It seems we can't win...
I'd say too much of either is a bad thing, best thing to do is have a healthy balance of both then lead an active lifestyle outside of the office!
https://www.theguardian.com/science/sifting-the-evidence/201...
This is complete garbage. The fact is, there is nothing you do to do 100% reverse the effects of sitting all day. You can maybe improve things by 20% or something like that. Progressive people keep hoping that you can use some kind of technology to change things but you can't. Standing desks don't do anything, standing up every hour doesn't do anything. There is nothing you can do. We are designed a certain way and if we don't live that way our health suffers greatly. The only solution is to go back to living that way no matter how hard you try to believe anything else.
Nobody can confidently assert this now; you are stating your belief, not a fact.
We would need to do longitudinal studies on all the alternatives (standing desks, periodic walking) to be able to build up a picture. To my knowledge, that has not yet been done. It may take decades to build up a picture.
Until then, people can choose options based on existing theories. In time, those theories will either be validated or refuted, but they have not yet been.
What does confidently asserting something have to do with a lack of scientific proof? Personal experience allows people to confidently assert things.
> We would need to do longitudinal studies on all the alternatives (standing desks, periodic walking) to be able to build up a picture. To my knowledge, that has not yet been done. It may take decades to build up a picture.
You can build up a picture on the previous decades where everything has failed. Technology has failed. Standing desks have failed. Current "workstations" were the solution to previous problems, and they have failed. Everything has failed. We are at a turning point where non-science religion people have realised that we can't keep going down the same path while technological messiahs keep claiming the future will be great.
We can look back at the decline in human health. Why do we need tooth paste? It isn't a revolutionary new advance, it is a way to make our teeth slightly better but never better than before farming and industrialisation.
Citation? Because there are a lot of studies on the positive impact of exercise. And there are plenty of very healthy people that spend most of the day sitting but implement spaced exercise plans.
> Because there are a lot of studies on the positive impact of exercise.
None of those studies say "this 100% reverses the effects of sitting".
> And there are plenty of very healthy people that spend most of the day sitting but implement spaced exercise plans.
I know experts in health and fitness who spend a lot of the time at the gym who will even admit to you that they can't get their body right. You can watch them implementing standing desks and various things and constantly trying to implement new things. None of them are working because they are constantly still trying to implement new ways to correct their sitting around all day. It will never work because there is no technology solution to anything and there never has been. There is no technological solution to climate change. You can't have 7 billion people on the earth. There is nothing you can do.
Your muscles are fixed in a position. I know pretty much everything there is to know about the muscles involved. The hip flexors are constantly shortened from sitting all day. Some of them attach to your leg, others to your spine. You cannot spend an hour in the gym or stretching and fix 8 hours of sitting. It is simply impossible. I have tried everything you can do. You can strengthen the hip extensors such as the glutes and hamstrings, but it still doesn't work. You can stretch the hip flexors and it still won't work. It just improves things a bit. You will find people all over the internet say "how do I fix my anterior pelvic tilt", and they will continue asking the same questions forever because there are no 100% solutions.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=new+guinea+tribes&t=hb&iax=1&ia=im...
What about walking around for 5 mins after every pomodoro. Is it still considered "too much sitting" ?
Hours of inactivity will harm you. Frequent breaks, help.
Yet in just a few months I feel my posture improving since I started psychotherapy and somatic experiencing therapy for trauma. Along with that I go to yoga once or twice a week. It's importnat to note here because I see the cogs spinning already... I actually did yoga years ago and did not notice the same effects. Therapy has been key to the changes I've observed in my posture.
My conclusion is a lot of bodily tensions are connected with unresolved emotional charges. This is related to the nervous system at some level.
My point is that posture, and general routine is symptomatic of your general emotional wellbeing.
As with all things in life, moderation is the key. Just doing a 1h30 yoga class once a week will probably offset much of the problems mentioned in the article.
I mean, I've sat at a computer (both for passion and work) for the past twenty years and have NEVER been fat. In fact I was underweight due to anxiety. I put on some weight in the gym in my early thirties which 70% have stayed without doing any regular exercise (which further confirms a health issue symptomatic of emotional / nervous system troubles affecting appetite).
I suspect that improving posture and making an effort to keep a good posture goes a long way also to offset the problems of sitting.
Don't get me wrong.. I can see in yoga class that sitting a lot has made muscles between inner thigh and pelvis very tight, as well as all the front making it diffuclt to stretch in various postures.
The problem here is assuming that N hours spent sitting equal N equivalent "damage". But that's not how our body works. It may be that you only need a good gym or yoga session just once a week to offset much of the problem. Not that it "undoes" the damage; but rather seeps into the rest of the week with more tonus in posture, and more postural awareness.
TLDR: context. Nobody gets fat because of sitting. If weight is really an issue I would suggest to seek therapy or if you feel that is not needed, try yoga or massage. Anything that takes you out of the left hemisphere's imbalance (cf. "The Divided Brain" by Iaian McGilchrist), and nurture more being in direct contact with the body, sensations, breathing.. as well as being more connected with others outside of intellectual activities. Surprisingly a lot of people think that "socializing" means talking. No, to be truly with others around you, is to be able to be there instead of taking refuge in the mind. That means to be at home in your body and how it feels. It's a journey.. it doesn't need to be taken in a couple days ;)
After a good yoga course of ~1h30.. your mind should feel quiet. If it isn't then it's not a good course. Over time, you should also become aware of bodily tneisons in various areas. ANd perhaps even become aware of old memories, perhaps even cry. Those are completely normal aspects of yoga when it has a therapeutic potential. It happens as consciousness is more evenly distributed in all parts of the body. It restores the left/right brain hemisphere balance, it takes you out of the map, and more in touch with reality in its raw form.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Reich#Character_Analys...
> ... Reich proposed a functional identity between the character, emotional blocks, and tension in the body, or what he called character (or muscular/body) armour (Charakterpanzer).
The way to heal trauma is to create a safe environment, and for the individual to gradually also come out of dissociation that comes not only from drugs but also anger... one has to put the shield down so to speak.. to be able to regain the full range of physical and emotional sensitivity and feel alive in this world.
With that said, it is one year of self exercises from a bioenergetic book that helped me become aware of the anger I had repressed much of my life. And that was the necessary step to go and reach out for assistance. But once I started therapy the exercises just made things more difficult.
I found the same with chinese plants. Some plants clearly have noticable effects on emotional states, such as Bupleurum, Cyperus, ... by helping release constriction in the solar plexus / liver area. However afterm onths of experimenting with them and in the context of trauma, I can only conclude that it made things more difficult.
In the end, it is consciousness that heals. So no amount of plants of bioenergetics sexercise can heal trauma. That's because they are still a way of controlling experience, while healing is the opposite direction: to release control, to allow everything to bubble up in awareness. Control comes from the left hemisphere, and is precisely what created the suffering in the first place.
It has nothing to do with the stated concern based on the cited research whatsoever at all.
The issues raised here refer to base level physical activity and its influence on things like triglyceride and cholesterol behaviors. And the repeating pattern is that even small activities, like moving around to get a drink, or just standing, literally doing nothing else, raise you into the threshold where your body is "normal" in how it deals with these things.
Sitting, however, seems to be an outlier, allowing a degradation of these processes. Well guess what? Exercising once a day even won't change that, as the response time is quick. SO this isn't about you being a bike commuter, a rock climber, or a swimmer. It's about sitting specifically. It's about mounting evidence that our bodies evolved to expect constant muscular activity even at low levels and the near zero that happens during sitting is an outlier.
You know, sitting is fairly unusual. In many areas of the world, both ancient and modern, people don't really sit. They squat, or stand, or shuffle around, but full on sitting is uncommon for a lot of people. I betcha the ol' asian/slavic squat activates enough muscles to not count as sitting.
In one of the papers they even concede that heavy fidgeting might be enough to breach the threshold.
So really what we're talking about is getting out of your chair, moving around, all the time if possible. Yeah that's hard for a programmer. Plus you can't ignore even very current research showing that standing itself, is harmful when doing it too much (for totally unrelated reasons.) So standing desks are a bad plan too.
You know, I can't sit that long. I am not too worried about this for me. I shift around too much. Stand and wander in thought, get drinks, go to the bathroom, slide off my chair and kneel at the desk. Grab the tablet and flop around all over the house (I WFH 100%.) I go crazy staying at the desk constantly, for work anyway. Let's not talk about leisure time :)
But upon reviewing a number of these studies, this is apparently exactly what's needed. Standing 1 minute every hour isn't a enough, no. But it's the right direction. The problem mainly being that sitting in a chair requires little to no physical effort at all whatsoever. That's the issue.
Exercising 2, 3, 5 days a week, 1-2-3 hours? Doesn't matter. Don't confuse the two issues.
That said, I bet those goofy desk bicycling things you put by your chair would do the trick, assuming they actually require some level of effort.
Why not healthy lifestyle and modern medicine?