> then only flaws in the logic are red flags.

Sure, but the mathematics community knows that some red flags like the ones I pointed out, have an extremely high correlation rate with a wrong proof.

That's not enough to claim correctness or wrongness, and that's why I just spoke of "red flags".

> If you are not interested in the problem, why did you click the link?

I am very interested in the problem. However I am not interested in a thorough verification of the proof, which would take days.

Exactly as I am interested in some software projects, but I am not interested in performing a complete audit of their source code.