The Impotence of Zuckerberg

medium.com

2 pointsokket3 comments

the content of that story violates the rules of Medium. It is using harassment by calling him impotent (and not in a metaphorical way).

I was under the impression that Zuckerberg had children. How then can calling him impotent be anything but metaphorical?

In any case, this is clearly not harassment for a very simple reason: it is not directed at Zuckerberg. Even were Zuckerberg to be hurt by these claims, he is unlikely to see them without seeking them out, and so won't be harmed by them.

I guess it really depends on what definition of impotent you use. To quote the author: "He’s impotent because he is captive to something else." linking to another article by the author about how skynet (well the idea of it) is becoming a reality.

This author has quite a few posts that make some very strange and out there claims.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com