https://6thfloor.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/04/its-not-easy-s...
https://6thfloor.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/04/its-not-easy-s...
Roberson, D., Davidoff, J., Davies, I. R., & Shapiro, L. R. (2005). Color categories: Evidence for the cultural relativity hypothesis. Cognitive psychology, 50(4), 378-411.
On top of that there is also Berinmo tribe that " marks a color boundary that is absent in English (i.e., a boundary within the English green category), but also fails to mark other boundaries that are found in English (e.g. the boundary between blue and purple (Roberson, Davidoff, Davies, & Shapiro, 2005)"
isn't quite the same as
is able to discriminate among shades of green that basically look the same to us
Also, from the actual Himba study (by the way,the study was conducted and published) "Himba participants show categorical perception only for their own linguistic categories and not for either the supposed universal categories of English" Roberson et al., 2005 (full citation in another comment)
Then I follow the link to the original [2] chart, which claims RGB values of 80/186/15, except for the odd one which is 97/192/4. But my color picker is showing the same as before: everything is 0/199-206/0.
Something is not right here.
Edit: Here are the two colors he intended, based on the labeling of [2]. I can tell them apart.
https://www.webpagefx.com/web-design/color-picker/50BA0F
https://www.webpagefx.com/web-design/color-picker/61C004
[1] In Mac OS X you can pull up the "digital color picker" from spotlight search.
[2] had to to change to http from https ... should be safe for this context: http://origin.boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/ring...
Those aren't the same colors. They're both greens, but different in both exact hue and in brightness. This has nothing to do with words, but with the precision of the human eyeball.