This article has some more details about the history: https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/26/yahoo-open-sources-vespa-for...
Disclamer: I work on the Vespa team in Trondheim, Norway.
This article has some more details about the history: https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/26/yahoo-open-sources-vespa-for...
Disclamer: I work on the Vespa team in Trondheim, Norway.
From the repo, it looks like an absolutely huge, monolithic codebase. (It even bundles its own memory allocator!) Do you know if there are plans to break it up into smaller, more manageable pieces?
While I haven't looked at what's required to deploy this beast, operationally speaking, it sounds it might be daunting to run, and for non-"big data" applications might very well be overkill as an alternative to Elasticsearch.
No plans to break it up into pieces (apart from already consisting of modules). It does one thing, it just happens to be a big thing :-)
If you have a mac of Linux box you can have it up and running in 10 minutes. Multi-node production deployments are no different because Vespa manages the nodes, not you directly.
This may be a difference in mindset, but we generally let apps define the schema, so it's in the developer's realm of responsibility, not an operational concern. We also have apps (currently using Elasticsearch) that manage the schema automatically, derived from a high-level application definition. With ES, the app creates a new index with new mappings, shovels data into the new index, and then activates the new index. But it uses the ES APIs to do this, and restarting anything is not on the table.