WeChat confirms it makes all private user data available to Chinese government
moneycontrol.com
moneycontrol.com
I use WeChat every day, but I hesitate momentarily before writing anything negative about the Chinese Govt... just in case.
I suppose they’ve done their job.
One of the things I like about my country is that I can call my government out when they make bad choices and I can even organize a protest to show my displeasure.
Having moved to Taiwan after spending many years in Beijing, the feeling of a weight being lifted off is palpable. I don’t miss those towering windowless soviet-style government building one bit.
Like you, I have no desire to overthrow my government. I do like to complain about then, however.
As for living somewhere oppressive, I don't think I'd do well in a place where I was hopeless. I'd probably end up being a dead revolutionary, just because I would have wanted to feel hope.
Tencent WeChat QQ 0/100. Hopeless.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kik_Messenger
Company CEO Ted Livingston stated Kik's aspirations to become "the WeChat of the West" and said that attracting younger users was an important part of the company's strategy
I also find it inconceivable that Ted @ Kik would do this. Disclosure: I've known him for years
Could be interesting to make a more "controlled experiment".
WeChat simply skips the warrant checking and request scoping.
All chat content in clear text, friend timelines, group chats, are piped into a gov't blackbox in datacenter.
There are dozens of cases when a guy complains about parking tickets in his private timeline then got detained for 3-7 days.
Recent hot buzz is a guy in private group chat joked about a new guy's bin laden avatar "are we gunna join ISIS" then got 9 months jail time[1] for "soliciting terrorism".
(On a side note, the tabloid, GlobalTimes once reported that whether ISIS is a terrorism organization is questionable.[2])
[1]: http://news.163.com/17/0923/02/CV03O5BO00018AOP.html [2]: http://mil.huanqiu.com/observation/2014-09/5140363.html
I've never used WeChat, that's interesting to me. How does the real-time censorship work exactly? If I attempt to discuss the Tiananmen Square massacre, would that chat message be instantly 'deleted' after sent (in however much time it takes for them to screen the message that is), something akin to that?
I assume the Chinese government got access to all my contacts, pictures, etc.
I really wish that apps were required to function in gracefully degraded modes when denied access to permissions they want. And I wish they had to explain each request.
That's not true for the iOS version.
http://technode.com/2017/09/19/now-its-official-wechat-is-wa...
Apparently the mainland China version of the app lets you continue using it without providing certain info; this is now in its privacy policy (technode translation):
"Unless it’s required by relevant laws, your objection in providing this information will block the feature concerned, but will not influence the usage of other features."
1 - http://money.cnn.com/2017/08/14/news/economy/trump-china-tra...
And in the US. And in Europe. And in Russia. And...
It's not clear the government of any country can freely read your Signal or iMessage messages they way China can read your WeChat messages.
You're kidding, of course.
They are wrong, but it's a common misbelief. China government wants to censor posts that initialize collective action, not criticism. See this quantitive study from Harvard[0].
[0]: https://gking.harvard.edu/publications/how-censorship-china-...
"A Chinese star TV anchor is facing "severe punishment" over jokes he made about Mao Zedong, state media report. A video of Bi Fujian singing a parody song at a private banquet and insulting the former Chinese leader in strong language was posted online in April."
Well, officially this, but for many other reasons as well:
No you don't. If I drive a car, I have to have license and show that if asked by the police but that is a requirement of driving. If I am a passenger, I don't have to have an ID. I can take an airplane flight without an ID, that has been shown time and time again. Taking the train and ID'ing yourself might be condition of being able to use a train, not law.
If I am out and about, I don't have to show the military my ID, I don't have to show security guards my ID and if I am not accused of a crime, I don't have to show the police my ID. Try that in China.
> To get a mobile phone you have to ID yourself (and sign in-person for the package if a phone is delivered to you) in the US.
Not true. I bought a T-Mobile SIM card with cash and activated it at home and I could have put anything into the address information. I have never once shown my ID when dealing with my T-Mobile account. Try doing that in China.
Maybe there are ways around all this, just like how in China, I bought a monthly subscription (not just pre-paid) China Unicom SIM at an official outlet using cash with no ID, and took many train and bus rides with just a ticket in hand.
Yes, they both involve proving your identity but that is where the similarity ends.
This has been largely true for the last 10 years. The same is true for any bus that crosses provincial boundaries. That includes every major Chinese train station (excluding HK/TW) in every city most people can name. If someone else bought you a ticket, they put a fake (probably western) ID on it or they did a favor of using your ID without telling you (that's why they ask for your Passport#). Even the standard electronic purchase stalls only print out a ticket if you provide a China ID, or in a small number of cases a Passport. Everywhere else you have to stand in line to provide ID to the ticketing agent.
All patrons of a hotel must provide an ID (even if you are a non-paying guest) to check in. If it is a foreign ID, they must photocopy it and provide it to the authorities (including your visa information). If you stay at an AirBnB, you must check in at the local Police Station with your Passport/Visa. Not doing so is a crime punishable by imprisonment and revocation of your visa!
AT&T is requiring you to show ID as a security measure, not because the US gov't requires it. You're talking about them using your ID for authentication, to protect you from someone impersonating you to make unwanted changes to your account. This does not preclude you from being able to walk into an AT&T (or T-Mobile) store and get an activated SIM card with cash and without showing ID.
Ditto for the hotel security guard check. If they had required your ID at check-in for any purpose other than authenticating you against their reservation record, then that would be a problem. If you could walk into the hotel without a reservation and pay for a room with cash without flashing ID, then the parent's point stands. (And even if you couldn't, this may just be a particular hotel's policy, which is fine. The point being made is that the government is not requiring this. There are plenty of hotels in the US that are perfectly happy with anonymous money.)
As for flights, there's definitely more government involved with ID'ing you, but you can absolutely fly without ID. You just need to go through extra security screening, which is a pain, but works just fine.
My experience in China is over a decade old, so I won't comment on that.
This is a security precaution to edit your account. It's a good thing and this is also not part of a condition of setting up the account.
> At a major city hotel late at night, I produced my ID to a security guard who otherwise would not let me in with just my room key.
Same thing as above. You have to show ID as part of security for the Hotel and it is not required by law.
> At an airport security check, being over 18, I produced a government-approved ID to board the flight.
You don't have to produce ID to fly. Again, this has been shown time and time again.
That's not hard to do in China (well, your SIM card would be China Mobile or China Unicom, not T-Mobile), unless they've made some drastic changes in the last couple of years. But since I've seen the claim that you had to provide ID to buy a SIM card made at times where I knew it was currently false, I strongly suspect it's still false.
You can buy a prepaid phone and minutes with cash in the US. I bought an Android phone and a minutes with a prepaid card just a month ago (with a credit card, but if I could have used cash), and activated it without giving any personal information.
https://www.tsa.gov/travel/security-screening/identification
More: https://www.thrillist.com/travel/nation/how-to-fly-without-a...
In China, you can also get temporary ID from train stations and airports if you misplaced it.
It is really funny for me to see comments like this used to show US being better than China, when all I see is the act of shooting yourself in the foot - "We don't need ID to travel, because we can exploit the exception made for losing or misplacing ID."
If you really want to compare the ability to exploit the system, I doubt US citizens can beat Chinese citizens.
It's a little disingenuous to compare the US and China in this way. In the US, air travel is literally the only form of transportation where an ID is (by convention) required. It is absolutely the norm when you are traveling in the US by car (as a passenger), bus, or train that you never show any form of ID, ever.
> In China, you can also get temporary ID from train stations and airports if you misplaced it.
I think it's telling that it's even possible to get a temp ID in China from so many places if you've misplaced yours. That tells me that having your ID at all times in China is a necessity, and not having it can cause you problems. In the US, if you lose your ID, it's annoying, but it's not a big deal to be without an ID for a while.
> If you really want to compare the ability to exploit the system, I doubt US citizens can beat Chinese citizens.
Ultimately you want to not have to exploit the system. In that it's just not necessary, because the system is fair, or at least there are efficient legal remedies when it's unfair. Obviously neither the US nor China have such great systems, but, again, I find it telling that the need to exploit the system is so great in China that it's so commonplace and everyone is so good at it. So I find your statement about that kinda sad, not a good thing.
Obviously, this is only true if you stay in the country.
Then again, I am totally used to people getting angry when I say China is not necessarily worse than US in some aspect regardless of right or wrong.
If you really want to be genuine, try to read my comments with a fresh state of mind and see what I am trying to convey.
Edit: maybe you also interpreted my comment wrongly? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15318245
I didn't mean to say "not requiring an ID" is an exception to all forms of travel in the US. So please stop downvoting me if you understand what I mean.
> Well that is an exception to the rule rather than the norm.
It is? I've literally never given my ID on SFBART or Amtrak, what modes of travel besides being the driver of a car have you had to have a form of state or national ID?
I can ride the light rail all over my city through buying a pass with cash. I can ride in the car between all 48 contiguous states without needing an ID. Going through TSA checkpoints or leaving/entering the country are the only forms of travel which require an ID or filing a form essentially equivalent to an ID.
As in, I was fully expecting to at least show a credit card or passport, but there was never any hint of that at all.
A lot of Chinese I know might support their government because they are working to further Chinese interests. But I generally don't hear them trying to export their system of government.
Americans on the other hand...
Besides "largely" the keyword here as an artificial differentiation only leads to some kind of general denial (by its own citizens) that works in the favour of USA's surveillance machinery.
[1] http://thehackernews.com/2015/09/lenovo-laptop-virus.html
Holocaust denial is a conspiracy theory. Mass survilance is a fact of life.