Reliability-wise, it sucks. Maybe it's gotten better recently, but I still probably wouldn't trust it.
But is there a document store out there that's faster than MongoDB?
But is there a document store out there that's faster than MongoDB?
It's built on .NET Core, and our current performance is 140k writes/sec. We also bend over backwards to optimize read speeds: we generated indexes automatically based on your query patterns, discarding unused indexes and throwing server resources behind the hot ones. Also, unlike many other NoSQL databases, we support transactions and atomic writes.
[0]: https://ravendb.net
Very curious about RavenDB as I’m writing a lot of .NET Core these days. How would you say it stacks up against ArangoDB?
Edit: Ok, just saw the pricing. Ouch.
- Free, with a max of 3 cores and 3 distributed nodes
The paid version will be an Enterprise license without these limits.
I used to use Mongo a while ago and found it a very painful experience (this was a few years ago). With postgresql I can use SQL and get the benefits of document storage, and so-far I've found it efficient and rock-solid.
Especially if you’re using the search tools to retrieve data, I think a properly indexed MarkLogic would be quite a bit faster, and still more reliable.
https://github.com/pingcap/tidb https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach
They provide the features of both RDBMS, such as ACID transactions, SQL, and the scalability of NoSQL.