Hacker News Reader

You mean like this? http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/347007-wikileaks-rej...

I only wonder how many times similar things happen but we don't hear about it because the source doesn't have the connections/credibility to make WikiLeaks' refusal known.

View on HN

If it had been legitimate dirt on Russia or Trump, the NYT or Washington Post would have published it. That means this guy was attempting to discredit Wikileaks by passing them bogus intel like the "Trump dossier" mixed with already public info. Wikileaks made the right call, and you sound mad about it.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com