>> Instead, we should switch to the low level dual of this problem - game theory and reinforcement learning
This sounds a bit naive.
This sounds a bit naive.
Quite a few people on either side of the physicalism - dualism debate seem to be more keen on declaring victory and cutting off further discussion than they are in getting to the bottom of the issue.
BTW, on Searle's 'Chinese Room' argument, I have always been in the 'the system as a whole would be conscious' camp.