"Pain gun" gets deployed in Afghanistan
engadget.com
engadget.com
If the cops had the pain ray, they would have used it just the same.
Scary times ahead!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1702897/posts
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18725095.600
if too much water on the skin causes horrible burns I do not want to think about what would happen to the water in contacts or even in your eyes.
In that case, though, I'm thinking that my instinct upon getting hit with a pain-causing weapon would be to mash the accelerator and try to drive out of range. Also, I don't think it would be all that effective on someone inside a metal car.
A famous general once said "It is well that war is so terrible — lest we should grow too fond of it."
This has the same problem as tazers: some things are supposed to be difficult, ugly, and nasty to do, like bringing a population to bear under rule of law, or convincing an unarmed (or lightly-armed) mob that there is no need to protest. The folks that think that these things are somehow more humane are living in a delusional world. These things only solve a short-term problem at the expense of creating a much worse problem later on.
Having said that, they also look very interesting in terms of doing things like patrolling the North Korean border. Hard to launch an invasion if all of your soldiers feel like they are on fire. And I support the use in Afghanistan -- there are lots of good things these tools can accomplish.
But overall I think this is a step backwards, not forwards.
Compared to, say, ancient Egypt?
There's a problem of scale with any centralized authority. While it's relatively easy to have total control over a population of a few thousand, span-of-control problems mean that multiple levels of managers must be involved the larger the populace.
Note that I am not saying that folks are more oppressed now than at any other time in history (aside from obvious examples). I am saying that the ability for a central authority to monitor and control each person's behavior has scaled enormously.
Every large enough organization experiences a tremendous degree of infidelity between the authority's wishes and how those wishes are actually carried out. Most folks look at some huge thing like, say North Korea, and think that there is one person completely in charge, and on paper it looks like that. But reality doesn't work like that at all. Instead central authorities in large systems constantly have to use persuasion, politics, and marketing tactics to get their wishes fulfilled. This was true with ancient Rome and much as today.
So there is a constant give-and-take between the ideals and plans of leaders and the zeitgeist of the ruled. This, along with regularly-changing leadership, allows organizations to learn and adapt. Effective organizations embrace this tension and provide a means for regularly changing course, sometimes in a dramatic way.
But what if leaders didn't have to worry about all those middle-level guys and discontent? What if you could have one central person/group that could monitor each person's actions minute-to-minute, applying various forms of non-lethal pain every time the person steps out of line? Don't like the food prices and want to go downtown to yell at the leaders? Well maybe we'll let you feel like you are on-fire for a few minutes and see how likely you are to try that again. Caesar doesn't have to worry about the Senate or governors in the provinces or the mob any more -- with computers and non-lethal population control, he can effectively manage hundreds of millions as easily as he could some bloke sitting in front of him in the same room.
The state-of-monitoring discussion is for another thread. The key point here is that monitoring and control becomes a lot more palatable if nobody is getting hurt, so by inventing lots of forms of non-lethally controlling folks, leaders can squeeze tighter and tighter. Never before in history has it been that way. When the United States passed prohibition, everybody nodded their heads and drank anyway. Over time, it was painfully obvious what a disaster prohibition was. It's not that way today. Back then, to enforce prohibition you had to have tens of thousands of cops and FBI agents who were true believers and willing to harm and kill people to enforce the law. Those people simply didn't exist. The people who passed prohibition had morals, righteous feelings, and a majority vote on their side, but they wanted the impossible from the population.
Today we're cutting way back on the systemic checks -- it only takes one true-believer in prohibition somewhere in the government to do some data mining of cell phone locations over time to easily find out where all the gin joints are. It only takes one or two guys to deploy some non-lethal force on those establishments to make them off-limits -- all without the nasty political fall-out of people harmed or killed -- or the practical requirement of actually having a big enough percentage of the population that supports enforcement (instead of just enactment)
We live in an incredible time in history. We're seeing this massive system of state control develop on a scale that would boggle the minds of folks just fifty years ago. I'm hoping for a century or two of Pax Romana before we end up with a Caligula -- but I wouldn't bet on it.
Depending on the energy consumption, this technology might serve as a nice protection inside buildings. Like areas where you don't want unauthorized personel to go to. For everyone else you could "lower the shield" for the moment of passing-through.
If the actual weapon is classed as non-intrusive, it could potentially be used in situations where Police wouldn't usually use force. Political protests, general non-cooperation, etc..
The idea worries me a lot. The people who invent this kind of thing really must be quite peculiar, to be able to function without moral objection.
It sure is a nice, big target for insurgent RPGs though! I wonder in what ways it'll be protected — even mounted on a heavily armoured vehicle, the dish would be vulnerable to damage, right?
From what I have read it's been fine-tuned to a specific frequency that penetrates the skin so far and is prefect for causing the nerves to react. If so it should be easy to create a suit that would nullify the effect using a metal mesh suit and helmet.