> hate speech" is not a class.
As a hacker, do you not see that there's a security vulnerability here that's big enough to drive a truck through? You simply label whatever you don't like as hate speech, then you're magically allowed to censor it.
As a hacker, do you not see that there's a security vulnerability here that's big enough to drive a truck through? You simply label whatever you don't like as hate speech, then you're magically allowed to censor it.
;-)
When you subscribe to their service you agree to their terms
The right to be published or served through a gateway is not an universal human right
This is demonstrably not true; it just requires the victim to be a member of a protected class. Private businesses can not legally deny service to ethnic minorities, women, people with disabilities, or gay people.
The law determined many decades ago that some people are more equal than others.
They can deny service to those people. They just can't do it because of their membership in those protected classes.
What's a protected class?
What I mean is: I'm from Italy, Europe, what is a protected class here may not be a protected class where Cloudflare operates.
The only protected classes are those that Cloudflare decided are protected.
You can't force them to publish for example nazi propaganda because it comes from a disabled person.
I certainly don't think it would be "unconstitutional" to bar infrastructure companies from moderating content, like we already do with telcos.
Cloudflare it's not an internet infrastructure company
It's a service
Don't use Cloudflare, host your server behind your DSL line and write whatever you want.