> Ought I not to bother?

Does the act of intellectual honesty displayed on that blog, and the concomitant discovery that the author is a fallible human being, make you more or less inclined to read a work that was rather widely pronounced to be brilliant?

Honestly, it only gets richer in the context of this comment from Kahneman. The core of the book (parts III and IV) don't rely on priming or other small N studies.

Sure, but be prepared to be skeptical. A lot of Kahneman's work rests on these kinds of studies, or on things that, on reflection, call to mind this XKCD:

https://xkcd.com/169/

That is, they involve questions which were designed to communicate one thing while secretly "really asking about" another thing, so that the questioner could then shout "Ah-HA! Your biases caused you to misinterpret that!"

You should definitely bother.

I'd say yes. And/or go for his earlier more scientifically formatted Judgment Under Uncertainty, not sure if that's been put into audio form though...

This question is asked at the bottom of the linked comments, with an interesting answer from the blog author.

It is a great book I'd say.