I am seeing a trend of people writing more or less the same thing:
"A slow business is a good one, you don't need to devote everything to it."
Which is of course, true, but I'm unsure why it needs to be stated and who the author is trying to reach.
> We tell stories about entrepreneurs who take big risks because risk is sexy. People who take risks, the implication goes, are fearless. It makes for a great story... So here’s an alternative: play the slow-game.
Separately, I don't agree with the premise that big risks in and of themselves are sexy. Big Risks around a overwhelmingly huge opportunity, in an exciting sector with clear momentum are what is sexy.
Nobody thinks the person with no capabilities, risking everything for a terrible idea is sexy. Like this guy:
The creator of "Bulletball:" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOOw2yWMSfk
Does anyone think this guy or his idea is sexy? No. Those people are cranks and loons and are generally derided and dismissed.