> then all undergraduate parents
Can somebody explain why the University would email the parents? What do they have to do with it? The students are of age, right?
> then all undergraduate parents
Can somebody explain why the University would email the parents? What do they have to do with it? The students are of age, right?
Back then, there seemed to be an implicit understanding that MIT, maybe unlike other places, gave you a lot of rope, and it was your job as a student to use it wisely. No parent got a letter saying their kid was caught on a roof (unless they were jumping, an idiot, or hurt somebody).
On the other hand, one autumn a few years after I graduated when I was still advising, I was at a brunch for the parents of new students. The Dean of Students at the time addressed the gathering by saying, "Trust in us. We will take care of your children".
I found it jarring then, and I find it jarring now. One dean, one speech, one fall, but wrong at so many levels.
If parents are paying the bills, that's between them and their kids. They can demand to see grades/results or cut funding. But if you'd teaching students they are adults-then that responsibility falls to the families in the situations where they are dependent on them for funding.
One of my housemates hated his parents and funded everything himself taking pc support jobs at a print shop and car dealership.
That felt right.
My kid's college calling me about other people's behavior in a dorm? That feels very, very wrong.
It’s straight up illegal.