Opioid use could account for 20% of decline in men’s labor force participation
brookings.edu
brookings.edu
> The increase in opioid prescriptions from 1999 to 2015 could account for about 20 percent of the observed decline in men’s labor force participation (LFP) during that same period.
That seems consistent, since severe pain generally prevents or limits work.
If we entertain this hypothesis for a moment by assuming there is a causal relationship between lack of meaning / purpose and higher propensity to engage in degenerative behavior and severe drug use, it then begs the questions: what changed? Where did people derive meaning and purpose in society before? Where are they getting it now? Where are they likely to get it in the future?
Again, entertaining the hypothesis, it would follow that setting up more drug clinics is unlikely to solve the problem because people are unlikely to find meaning through the current format of drug rehabilitation. A better solution long term may be increased emphasis on psychological rehabilitation.
I don't have the answer to any of these questions and certainly wouldn't say religion is the only answer. There are alternative ways to accomplish this. For example: as a society we can try to reinstill a greater sense of dignity in labor and non-managerial service roles.
Not being able to anchor your contributions to anything meaningful past "a business" it can be easy to feel like it doesn't really matter that much.
To poke at the digital world, most of what we create on our computers is ephemeral, transient and bound for quick obsolescence. With no roots in the real world, with no past to be a part of and no community to belong to, our efforts existing briefly at best, perhaps it is no wonder everything is underscored by a lonely existential dread.
I feel like having more history lends a bit more material to feel a connection to the past, and like you are part of a continuum, which can lend legitimacy to your current existence. You aren't just a fleshy blob meandering through a brief existence, you are part of a long and storied past of fleshy blobs and your existence is a chance to contribute to that story.
I would like to ask the OP to refrain from posting provocative titles which don't comply with the guidelines. I get that the issue is serious but all that title did was alarm me and waste my time.
It should be pretty easy to compare with any comparable country to see what the difference in opioid prescription is.
http://www.painpolicy.wisc.edu/opioid-consumption-data
Here we see the comparison with the AMRO zone (the Americas) which shows the US and Canada prescribe a lot more opioids than any other country in the Americas.
And here we compare AMRO to EURO: http://imgur.com/a/bb4wD
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/03/15/ameri...
> And what it finds about the United States is jaw-dropping: Even when the list is restricted to the top 25 heaviest consuming countries, the United States outpaces them all in opioid use.
> For example, Americans are prescribed about six times as many opioids per capita as are citizens of Portugal and France, even though those countries offer far easier access to health care. The largest disparity noted in the U.N. report concerns hydrocodone: Americans consume more than 99 percent of the world’s supply of this opioid.
> These data represent the amounts of opioids distributed legally in a country for medical and scientific purposes to those healthcare institutions and programs that are licensed to dispense to patients, such as hospitals, nursing homes, pharmacies, hospices and palliative care programs. Consumption does not refer to the amounts dispensed to, or used by, patients, but rather to amounts distributed to the retail level.
The question becomes - what are doctors elsewhere doing?
- Prescribing physiotherapy for e.g back pains, rather than meds?
Or
- prescribing other kinds of pain medication?
Or something else?
There is also a question of how many of these people had non-prescription addictions and simply switched to prescription drugs because it's convenient and doctors can be persuaded to prescribe.
Here in Europe I know many people (most?) who have been prescribed pain medication at some point, but no one who has had potent opioids outside of hospital. Typical pain med prescriptions are for higher-than-usual doses of non prescription drugs like paracetamol/ibuprofen and only in rare cases weaker synthetic opioids like tramadol.
Hydrocodone and similar opioids are typically only used for terminal cancer patients and are banned from general prescription. Methadone is used for treatment of heroin addiction though.
Making everyone healthy... will not be 100% good for their revenue... but I think they went too far on this.
Hope Trump would serve some delicacies called "justice"
It turns out that opioids, when used to treat long term pain, are more addictive than they thought. And also if you ask people about pain you end up treating a heck of a lot more people.
People in long term pain do need treatment, but that should normally be opioids as a last resort, and carefully controlled in a pain management clinic.
Here's the VA document: https://www.va.gov/PAINMANAGEMENT/docs/Pain_As_the_5th_Vital...
Here's a rebuttal which started the reduction in prescriibing opioids for long term pain: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1924634/
Tens of millions of men are suffering in a way that women aren't. It seems when something affects the sexes differently society treats it as gender issue and seeks to help women specifically.
There appear to be specific gender issues here hurting men more. I'd hypothesize unequal expectations. Is this an issue to look at from a gendered perspective?
Of course explaining that by opioids alone would be balancing between a huge oversimplification and a plain lie, but at least opioids have been the biggest single factor.
E.g. Another way for a country to lose the #1 economy spot is for it to simply stay the same while other nations (e.g. Europe in this case) make huge advances.
Being fair, a few other things happened in there too. I don't think that during the communists' Cultural Revolution the country was primarily being held back by opiod abuse.
If such a relatively innocent thing as inhaling lead vapours from suddenly omnipresent cars in 1960s and 1970s could cause a 1980s-1990s crime wave in the U.S., it is easy to see what putting whole nation on opioids could do with the next generation.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Century_of_humiliation
The Century of Humiliation started them on a road of weakness that took several revolutions to figure out how to stop. Only with Deng Xiaoping in the 80s did China begin to find its stride, and only now are they starting to finally become a world power that the world needs to reckon with instead of ignore. Whatever you think of politics and philosophies, China is now considered a world power in a way it never has been before.
In the scheme of a 1000 years of history you could argue 1970 counts as only now perhaps.
https://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2012/06/mis-ch...
The one thing that the US has consistently shown recently is for every state that has legalized or decriminalized/medicinal marijuana, opioid abuse and related deaths have plummeted, yet we have trump trying to crack down on this emerging trend.
So it's just more of say one thing but do another.
They are basically saying porn, social media, the news hype cycle are all tied to dopamine increase in your brain. Its the same mechanisms that drugs, alcohol,cigs can produce.
"...In earlier research presented at the Boston Fed in 2016, Krueger found that nearly half of prime age men who are not in the labor force take pain medication on a daily basis, and that two-thirds of those men—or about 2 million—take prescription pain medication on a daily basis..."
I take a baby aspirin every morning, so I would qualify as somebody taking pain medication daily.
I believe the opiod problem in the U.S. is an extremely serious thing, therefore we need to be very careful about what kinds of information we stick in our heads regarding it.
There's a ton of correlation here, things like "Over the last 15 years, LFP fell more in counties where more opioids were prescribed"
Well, okay. If more people are being injured and are in pain, they would get medication, right? And therefore there would be less people in the workforce. Because people are on pain meds doesn't mean that's keeping them from work. It might mean that things that keep you from work significantly involve pain.
I have no intention of trashing the article. It's worth reading. I would simply advise caution in jumping to conclusions.
My opinion is that mankind is finally creating the perfect world (relatively speaking compared to all of history): plenty of food and shelter. The internet and gaming means you'll never be bored. Throw in a little pharmacological assistance for any pain, boredom, ennui, depression, or loneliness you're feeling, and what more could you want?
But that's rampant speculation, which I readily admit. I worry about articles that encourage reader speculation without explicitly calling it out.
- a lot of those people do not need to take those products. Then we have an substance abuse problem.
- a lot of those people DO need to take them. Then we have a public health problem.
In both cases, ouch.
Substitute "recreational use" for "abuse" if it makes you feel better about the semantics. Then we can dissect the finer points of "recreational". An LEO told me his use of wine wasn't recreational because he only used it socially, not for the effects, whereas recreational drug users are always using it for the effects.