How the luxury industry makes a fortune through deception
waremakers.com
waremakers.com
With Sumptuary Taxes you can show people you're rich and they're not and help the commonweal at the same time: showing that you're one of the responsible, caring rich.
(Sumptuary – related to the word sumptuous, of course.)
Sumtuary Laws were tried in England in the Fourteenth Century, but for almost the reverse purpose – merely to prevent poor people from wearing clothes that resembled the clothes rich people wore. This didn’t raise any revenue and was intended to save rich people money while increasing social barriers. The laws weren’t very successful and they didn’t last long.
Or Tyrian purple. Quoting Wikipedia: The production of Tyrian purple was tightly controlled in Byzantium and was subsidized by the imperial court, which restricted its use for the colouring of imperial silks.[7] Later (9th century)[8] a child born to a reigning emperor was said to be porphyrogenitos, "born in the purple".
How would the government convince people that a purple car is a sign of luxury, and thus worth paying the sumptuary tax?
The "Made in Italy" mark (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Made_in_Italy ) is more strict than the EU laws, which allow shoes which are only finished in France/Italy to be "made in" those countries.
If people were interested in real authenticity, as this article suggests, then why aren't they looking for such marks already? Or are they?