Could you quote it? I see it remarking on people he expects to be beaten up, fantasising about people being beaten up (it seems, from two opposing factions at least), anticipating people begin beaten up with relish. But I didn't see any asking for people to be beaten up.

Standing back and hooting as someone else commits violent assault ain't right [understatement!], but it's far from calling those people to commit the assault. It doesn't read as incitement to me, 'just' applauding anticipated violence, deplorable as that is.

I'm really not sure text on a website should count as incitement any way (maybe if it's UGC with specific threats against particular people); but is that there even?

I don't want to read whatever that is too closely but looks like some random blog post where some idiot claims 'antifa' or 'right wing protestors' located at some rally 'deserve to be beaten up'.

You may find there are other blogging platforms out there with actual requests for violence, often justified with a tagline 'Punch a nazi!'.

I read this whole thing, unfortunately, to try and find the 'immiment threat of harm' and found none. This article is not a good example of what you claim I see no reason this should be seen as a threat of imminent violence. Simply saying 'so-and-so should get punched' is not, to me, a credible, real threat. Just some troll mouthing off.

Edit: that's like saying all the people who say on Twitter 'trump needs a punch to the face' are committing hate speech?