> Also forgot "vandal suspect"
The article describes the offence he was being chased for (according to the police).
Do you have a problem with that?
The article describes the offence he was being chased for (according to the police).
Do you have a problem with that?
The author was clearly trying to subjectively paint him, glossing over the fact that he was caught (allegedly) committing a crime.
Did he deserve to die, of course not. That's not the point.
The point, reporting on policing should be objective. Biasing your readership towards one point of view over another is only going it that much harder to get accountability.
Okay, but I'm talking about police accountability.