Cassini's Last Photos Will Be Spectacular
bloomberg.com
bloomberg.com
I was working at JPL during the 1990s when Cassini was being assembled so I actually got to see it with my own eyes before it launched. This feels like losing an old friend.
"...tides and radioactive elements, which could provide important catalysts for the development of life. Future missions to Enceladus can be designed to look for evidence of life..."
Oh jeez get over it will ya? Life life life. How living-centric of you. Check your alive privilege.
OK I'm joking about that part, but surely there must be a few good reasons to explore space besides whatever it has to do with life and the support thereof? Is an ocean of liquid methane not interesting in its own right?
I genuinely wonder whether people who write like this are going to be totally disappointed and give up space exploration if they find there's no life out there. Which (let's be honest) is what they will probably find. Or is it more that they're trying to pander to the reader because they think that's all we care about?
Edit: Let me clarify why I ask this, I had once seen some documentary where a marine biologist makes a point something to the effect of - we understand less about our deep oceans than space, but there is a huge delta in our research spending on each. So, why are certain fields more important for research than others, in short, why space?
When the Electron was discovered it was useless, and now it runs our entire world. Who can say where undirected research and exploration may lead us?