Panic Button: Lessons for the Tech-for-Good Sector
theengineroom.org
theengineroom.org
Just looks like a recipe for failure regardless of funding.
Another way to look at it, it was a success if measured in terms of raising awareness of the problem.
There's a lesson here somewhere for those who are optimistic about changing the world.
You also lose perspective, because all the skills you've gained to make money are really only applicable to making money, and by that point your social community will only be people making lots of money and then the only problems you'll be solving are the ones for people with resources. The best minds in the world are focused on figuring out how to make people click ads and make money in the stock market.
Sure there's outliers, and the most famous are the ones of people who have "won".
Not trying to sound snarky but I'm really trying to think of an example but can't find one.
Donations are nice, but it's not obvious to me that Carnegie was a net positive (or Gates or Musk, for that matter).
Donc si c'est vraiment utile, ca ne disparaitra peut etre pas
> help us use technology to prevent unlawful detentions
I thought they were talking about the Firefox Extension called Panic Button from ~10 years ago that we used in school to hide games and show an education site 'Preventing detentions'!
1) Only had £100,000
2) Would need more money to make the app deal with false alerts.
3) Would need more money to "keep up [...] our engagement with users."
What does this mean?