I find it unconscionable that a country with nuclear weapons and a space program still has a caste system, receives foreign aid in the 100s of millions (£) and is 93rd on the social progress index (2017). Get it together India!
Posting like this will get your main account banned too, so please don't do it again.
The cultural progress in India is very complex, it is nothing like the newly built USA - its histories and personal cultures are old and deeply entrenched - and it is nothing like the Europe that, in many ways, fucked it up with Empire. But we are seeing progress.
It is interesting to find that India is largely western sympathetic, and it is highly beneficial to westerners that it is. We put the geo-politics in western favour by ensuring they have nuclear weapons and advanced science programs, and we try and strengthen the nation and resolve the societal issues with aid money.
I'm not saying India doesn't have massive corruption, and I'm not saying the aid and incentives are definitely applied in the right way, but I am saying that calling out aid as incompatible with nukes and spaceflight highlights an ignorance of what goes on in India and the surrounding nations - and its impact on the west.
one could argue that the entire basis for 'european culture' is empire; for better or worse - and as a simple observation.
I mean, you could say this about literally anywhere. No space programs allowed until everything is perfect!
I could debate you on everything but I will take you up on this.
India has repeatedly requested UK not to donate any money for the last few years http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/india/9061844...
Most of the Western money anyway goes into "Christian Missionaries" in remote tribal areas.
India also donates more money than it receives. http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2017/mar/22/emerging-...
Or is India somehow special?
I despair of reasoning with such people. With attitudes like that, we would never have left the rift valley, the trees, the ocean, or the deep-ocean thermal vents.
So, screw that. Life can both evolve and be imperfect. There's no contradiction between having our feet in the gutters and our heads in the stars: we've basically been like that for as long as we've had feet and heads. And if you're bothered by the "feet in the gutters" (as I am), it's historically and philosophically bankrupt to suggest that the way to solve the problem with the gutters is to get our heads out of the stars. That doesn't work.
I've lived in India, and having had friends in and around ISRO, have gotten into conversations with low-caste rickshaw-wallahs about the space program. They fucking LOVE it. It is a huge symbol of hope and pride for them -- a reminder that given the opportunity, they are capable of anything. (The designer of India's successful Mars mission was a Dalit).
Of course when this anti-space attitude is espoused particularly by white people with respect to brown people, it's not only philosophically bankrupt, but racist. Double plus screw that.
I am asked questions upfront about rape culture. Nevermind the fact that these stories being in news and media emphasis that they are not the norm.
Also, I squarely understand that poor people in western countries hate India. They take solace in knowing that some people in the world are worse off then them. Successful Chinese are labelled as syndicates. Singapore means chewing gums not allowed.
I would say that India does have a rape culture, especially in North India. Except for a few small affluent areas in Delhi and Gurugram, women can't venture out safely.
giving the money directly to the poor is like giving a starving person a fish, having a space agency is teaching your people to make tofu.
It's probably not the single most effective measure against poverty, but it doesn't seem like the worst thing to do either.