> Human CO2 contribution and the basic warming effect are well understood.
Could you please point me to your most convincing scientific argument, so that I can understand it too?
Could you please point me to your most convincing scientific argument, so that I can understand it too?
A google search for "case for climate change" would also give you meaningful results. But, you already knew that.
What are your sources? Care to cite one?
There's also a web version where you can explore the highlights: http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/. The references are cited right there.
If you don't find this convincing, then I'd like to understand why. Also, if you don't trust this source (a US gov agency), I'd like to understand what kind of sources might you find more convincing.