Trump was:
Anti globalization in all of its manifestations (immigration, tariffs, taxes, trade)
That was what he ran on. How can you say he was pro corporation?
Anti globalization in all of its manifestations (immigration, tariffs, taxes, trade)
That was what he ran on. How can you say he was pro corporation?
It's hard to say that Trump is "pro corporation" though, because his cabinet also includes anti-globalization nationalists (most prominently Steve Bannon who is now gone, but there are others). The policy conflict between these groups (and others) actually has, in my opinion, been one of the strongest defining features of Trump's presidency so far.
I agree that Trump campaigned as an anti-corporate and (along with Sanders) showed that there is current popular discontent with the state of business in America.
He wasn't anti-globalization. If you listened to what he said, he was anti-"terrible" "free" trade deals which he claimed benefits other nations but not the US.
He was pro-globalization where the US wins - according to his definition.
> That was what he ran on. How can you say he was pro corporation?
Because he is? The guy is a "corporation".
You think a NY billionaire is "anti-corporation"?
The fact that people are even claiming that a NY billionaire is anti-corporations just proves my point. If Trump = "anti-corporation", then "anti-corporation" is meaningless.