Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

trendia

One such example:

With ranked-choice voting, if

45% voted Trump-Johnson-Hillary,

45% voted Hillary-Johnson-Trump, and

10% voted Johnson-(either)-(either),

then Johnson would have won, despite lacking wde first-choice approval.

View on HN

Not so. Assuming by "ranked choice voting" you mean IRV (the term ranked ballots doesn't say which algorithm is used to aggregate those ballots into a group decision), Johnson would be eliminated at the first step as he has the least votes. A Condorcet -compliant single winner voting system would likely elect Johnson in your example, as he seems to represent the best middle ground given the presented ballots. In actuality, voter preference is rarely so linear (one dimensional).

That's kind of the point, right? In this example it's a compromise that (based on these votes) nobody is really happy with but nobody is super unhappy with either.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com