The idea that they're supposed to learn on the job is insane, you don't get a lot of second chances on aflight deck, you don't get to make a lot of mistakes on a boat twice.
The idea that they're supposed to learn on the job is insane, you don't get a lot of second chances on aflight deck, you don't get to make a lot of mistakes on a boat twice.
- One we maintain to prove to our potential adversaries that we maintain it, in order to preserve stalemate.
- One we maintain to actually use.
I'm going to venture a guess that a well-functioning defensive military is inherently unstable, as anyone who understands how powerful it is will realize that it never actually has to function.
This is why it makes sense to have a purely defensive military work on a reserve and draft basis. You don't really need the defensive military - until you do - in which case you want to magic a really big and reasonably competent one into existence quickly.
Because no politician wants to go down in history books as the person who let the military shrink and lose readiness for a WW3. Sure, maybe the American military has indeed lost readiness, but it's more nuanced and can't be pinned on one person. So just like other parts of this thread suggest, it's a giant CYA operation.