[1]: https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=102...
Indeed, many sysadmins of the time lauded qmail's lack of supporting "standard features" in the name of "security" which sadly was still a new concept on the Internet.
Something to consider: SMTP over TLS offers some privacy and confidentiality between two mail servers that have established a trust relationship, but it offers no protection against an upstream network (who can simply fake some DNS records and get a letsencrypt certificate) or a state actor (who simply threatens the CA). I think referring to "SMTP over TLS" as "secure" is dangerous because it leads us to equate "more code" as providing security.