[1] - http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2011/08/01/gaps-in-a-docto...
And on a scientific scale, I give your assessment a zero. You have simply wielded the word "science" with contempt prior to any observation. IOW you're employing pseudoscience to make your point, then referencing a blog post which cherry picks assertions from a licensed scientist, cites them out of context, relies on analogy, and you present this as "Science". You have in essence conflated science with rhetoric, especially given the well-documented biases of the Skeptics, the organization behind scienceblogs.
I don't know anything about GAPS and have no stake in its validity going either way, but I can say that your accusations of unscientific behaviour come across as projection.
- mentions of "toxins" and "heavy metals"
- zero quality research or scientific backing
- broad list of afflictions it can miraculously cure, with little scientific reasoning for method for most
- supported by Dr Axe and other peddlers of bullshit
- origin story about how "mainstream medicine" failed the creator, who doggedly persisted in finding magic cure
Etc, etc.
Like most alternative treatments that aren't inherently harmful, I'd try it if everything else failed.
But this almost certainly doesn't work.
Edit: I mean, check out this blog post on eczema and the GAPS diet. I don't mean to make fun of this parent, but this is exactly what I'm talking about. I'm not sure there's any actual facts or understanding of science here at all. Almost every sentence is wrong. http://www.mariarickerthong.com/healing-eczema-with-the-gaps...