Take a look at Uber’s first pitch deck from 2008
recode.net
recode.net
In short: I don't think your comment actually addresses my point.
Again, they're basically silent on this topic in the deck, which might be accidental, but feels like an odd omission. If I read between the lines, it seems like they thought that because they avoid street hails, and because it was pitched as an invite-only service, somehow they puts them outside the existing regulatory structure. In hindsight, it's pretty clear that was at best a very naive assumption.
Btw, you might be interested in this snapshot of the Uber home page from January 2011: https://web.archive.org/web/20110109084838/http://www.uber.c...
[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/ellenhuet/2015/06/15/no-smartph...
[0]https://www.engadget.com/amp/2008/12/04/iphone-triples-marke...